> > Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't easily > backport the commit from the main branch.
Yes, I think JB's fix for main is https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15449 and I'm also working on a fix for the open-api module <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15872>. BTW, is this a new issue in 1.10.x that we have to fix in 1.10.2, or is it a long standing issue that we can fix later on main branch? On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 11:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't easily > backport the commit from the main branch. > > I can propose a PR to fix the licenses in the 1.10.x branch. I will work > on it right now. > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 4:23 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote: > >> @JB Thanks for watching the licenses! Which commits do we need to >> backport to address this? >> >> -Max >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 4:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > 0 (non binding) >> > >> > I checked: >> > - source distribution >> > -- signature and checksum are good >> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct >> > -- ASF header is present in all expected files >> > -- No compiled/binary file found in the source distribution >> > - iceberg-aws-bundle >> > -- LICENSE is not complete: >> > --- AWS SDK cloudwatch is not in the LICENSE >> > --- AWS SDK retries is not in the LICENSE >> > --- AWS SDK s3control is not in the LICENSE >> > --- failsafe is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3) >> > --- parquet is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3) >> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty) >> > - iceberg-azure-bundle >> > -- LICENSE is not correct: >> > --- azure-core is not in the LICENSE >> > --- azure-xml is not in the LICENSE >> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty) >> > --- gson is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Jose) >> > --- jackson-core is not correct in LICENSE (LICENSE contains 2.18.4, >> but the jar version seems to be 2.18.4.1) >> > - iceberg-gcp-bundle >> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct here >> > - iceberg-flink-runtime >> > -- LICENSE is not correct: >> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet) >> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE >> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE >> > - iceberg-spark-runtime >> > -- LICENSE is not correct: >> > --- Eclipse Collections is not in the LICENSE >> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE >> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE >> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet) >> > >> > I'm happy to propose a PR to fix that on the 1.10.x branch (main should >> be good already, I will do a pass). >> > >> > Regards >> > JB >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 5:54 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> >> >> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >> Iceberg 1.10.2 release. >> >> >> >> The commit ID is 1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753 >> >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 >> >> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 >> >> * >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753 >> >> >> >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >> >> * >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 >> >> >> >> You can find the KEYS file here: >> >> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >> >> >> >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository >> URL is: >> >> * >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1277/ >> >> >> >> Please download, verify, and test. >> >> >> >> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here: >> >> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release >> >> >> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.2 >> >> [ ] +0 >> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >> >> >> >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >> encouraged to cast >> >> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes >> and more binding >> >> +1 votes than -1 votes. >> >
