Hi

Yes, the PR for 1.10.x branch is on the way. It will be available soon.

Thanks Manu for the issue!

Regards
JB

On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 7:18 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks JB! When the PR for fixing the license/notice is ready just let us
> know. I went ahead and merged the trailing slash fix for HMS since I think
> it does make sense to include in a patch release.
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 8:13 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi JB,
>> I created https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16013 for you.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I think it will be good to get in
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16010, back-port of
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14295, fixing the trailing slash
>> issue for database paths in HMS.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Manu
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 12:58 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's the runtime-deps.txt file diff between `apache-iceberg-1.10.1`
>>> and `1.10.x`
>>> https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg/pull/17/files
>>>
>>> Looks like we've mostly just change the library versions.
>>>
>>> That said, we should still ensure that all entries are present in the
>>> respective NOTICE and LICENSE files. Thanks for catching that, JB!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Kevin Liu
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 8:08 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't easily
>>>>> backport the commit from the main branch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think JB's fix for main is
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15449 and I'm also working on a
>>>> fix for the open-api module
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15872>.
>>>> BTW, is this a new issue in 1.10.x that we have to fix in 1.10.2, or is
>>>> it a long standing issue that we can fix later on main branch?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 11:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't
>>>>> easily backport the commit from the main branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can propose a PR to fix the licenses in the 1.10.x branch. I will
>>>>> work on it right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 4:23 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @JB Thanks for watching the licenses! Which commits do we need to
>>>>>> backport to address this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 4:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 0 (non binding)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I checked:
>>>>>> > - source distribution
>>>>>> > -- signature and checksum are good
>>>>>> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
>>>>>> > -- ASF header is present in all expected files
>>>>>> > -- No compiled/binary file found in the source distribution
>>>>>> > - iceberg-aws-bundle
>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not complete:
>>>>>> > --- AWS SDK cloudwatch is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- AWS SDK retries is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- AWS SDK s3control is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- failsafe is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3)
>>>>>> > --- parquet is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3)
>>>>>> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty)
>>>>>> > - iceberg-azure-bundle
>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct:
>>>>>> > --- azure-core is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- azure-xml is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty)
>>>>>> > --- gson is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Jose)
>>>>>> > --- jackson-core is not correct in LICENSE (LICENSE contains
>>>>>> 2.18.4, but the jar version seems to be 2.18.4.1)
>>>>>> > - iceberg-gcp-bundle
>>>>>> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct here
>>>>>> > - iceberg-flink-runtime
>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct:
>>>>>> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet)
>>>>>> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > - iceberg-spark-runtime
>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct:
>>>>>> > --- Eclipse Collections is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I'm happy to propose a PR to fix that on the 1.10.x branch (main
>>>>>> should be good already, I will do a pass).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Regards
>>>>>> > JB
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 5:54 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>> Iceberg 1.10.2 release.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> The commit ID is 1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753
>>>>>> >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0
>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0
>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>> >> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1277/
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.2
>>>>>> >> [ ] +0
>>>>>> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
>>>>>> are encouraged to cast
>>>>>> >> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>> >> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to