Here's the PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16043

Regards
JB

On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 5:52 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> Yes, the PR for 1.10.x branch is on the way. It will be available soon.
>
> Thanks Manu for the issue!
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 7:18 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks JB! When the PR for fixing the license/notice is ready just let us
>> know. I went ahead and merged the trailing slash fix for HMS since I think
>> it does make sense to include in a patch release.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 8:13 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi JB,
>>> I created https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16013 for you.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, I think it will be good to get in
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16010, back-port of
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14295, fixing the trailing slash
>>> issue for database paths in HMS.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Manu
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 12:58 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's the runtime-deps.txt file diff between `apache-iceberg-1.10.1`
>>>> and `1.10.x`
>>>> https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg/pull/17/files
>>>>
>>>> Looks like we've mostly just change the library versions.
>>>>
>>>> That said, we should still ensure that all entries are present in the
>>>> respective NOTICE and LICENSE files. Thanks for catching that, JB!
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Kevin Liu
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 8:08 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't
>>>>>> easily backport the commit from the main branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I think JB's fix for main is
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15449 and I'm also working on a
>>>>> fix for the open-api module
>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15872>.
>>>>> BTW, is this a new issue in 1.10.x that we have to fix in 1.10.2, or
>>>>> is it a long standing issue that we can fix later on main branch?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 11:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't
>>>>>> easily backport the commit from the main branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can propose a PR to fix the licenses in the 1.10.x branch. I will
>>>>>> work on it right now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 4:23 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @JB Thanks for watching the licenses! Which commits do we need to
>>>>>>> backport to address this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Max
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 4:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 0 (non binding)
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I checked:
>>>>>>> > - source distribution
>>>>>>> > -- signature and checksum are good
>>>>>>> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
>>>>>>> > -- ASF header is present in all expected files
>>>>>>> > -- No compiled/binary file found in the source distribution
>>>>>>> > - iceberg-aws-bundle
>>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not complete:
>>>>>>> > --- AWS SDK cloudwatch is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- AWS SDK retries is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- AWS SDK s3control is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- failsafe is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3)
>>>>>>> > --- parquet is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3)
>>>>>>> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty)
>>>>>>> > - iceberg-azure-bundle
>>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct:
>>>>>>> > --- azure-core is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- azure-xml is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty)
>>>>>>> > --- gson is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Jose)
>>>>>>> > --- jackson-core is not correct in LICENSE (LICENSE contains
>>>>>>> 2.18.4, but the jar version seems to be 2.18.4.1)
>>>>>>> > - iceberg-gcp-bundle
>>>>>>> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct here
>>>>>>> > - iceberg-flink-runtime
>>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct:
>>>>>>> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet)
>>>>>>> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > - iceberg-spark-runtime
>>>>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct:
>>>>>>> > --- Eclipse Collections is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE
>>>>>>> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet)
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I'm happy to propose a PR to fix that on the 1.10.x branch (main
>>>>>>> should be good already, I will do a pass).
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Regards
>>>>>>> > JB
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 5:54 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.10.2 release.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> The commit ID is 1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753
>>>>>>> >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0
>>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0
>>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>> >> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1277/
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>>>>>>> >> *
>>>>>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.2
>>>>>>> >> [ ] +0
>>>>>>> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
>>>>>>> are encouraged to cast
>>>>>>> >> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>>> >> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to