Alpha cause asf doesnt have oracle tck so we cant validate binary compat but it targets jcache 1.0. More a legal thing than anything else. If you have access to tck and can validate the binaries we can move on 1.0 Le 27 mars 2016 00:21, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <dsetrak...@apache.org> a écrit :
> Hi Romain, > > The only issue I see is the version. JSR107 spec is on version 1.0.0 [1], > while the Geronimo JCache jar is on version 1.0-alpha-1. > > Any chance you can upgrade the version? > > [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/tree/v1.0.0 > > D. > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Dmitriy, >> >> why not reusing geronimo jar? Generally @apache spec are owned by >> geronimo and reused as much as possible using geronimo as umbrella >> spec project. What's the issue you hit? >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber >> >> >> 2016-03-26 21:20 GMT+01:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: >> > Sorry, this is the JCache maven dependency I was referring to: >> > >> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < >> dsetrak...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello Geronimo community! >> >> >> >> I have noticed that Geronimo implements JCache spec and is using its >> own >> >> JCache library hosted in Apache maven and licensed under Apache 2.0 >> license >> >> [1]. >> >> >> >> We, in Apache Ignite community also have implemented JCache >> specification >> >> and would like to do something similar. Do you know what steps do we >> need to >> >> take in order to have the latest JCache spec version licensed under >> Apache >> >> 2.0? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dmitriy Setrakyan >> >> Apache Ignite, PMC chair >> > >> > >> > >
