Vladimir, Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
— Denis > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Igniters, > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 > > Vladimir. > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Denis, >> >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already >> resolved >> by another fix made by Alexander. >> >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR. >> >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346 >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347 >> >> Best Regards, >> Igor >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP >> PDO >>> side. >>> >>> The first one is related to DML. >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346> >>> >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before >>> 1.8 is sent for vote. >>> >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well. >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347> >>> >>> — >>> Denis >>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Update for DML testing: >>>> >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from >>> previous >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Vladimir, >>>>> >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> >>>>> >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation >> is >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here. >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> Denis >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets >> you >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Vladimir. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected] >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts >>> in >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see >>>>> following >>>>>>> unclear points >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on >> ignite-cassandra-store? >>>>> In >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged >>> in >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8: >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send >> message >>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304 >>> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports >> several >>>>>>>> problems >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8 >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the >>> next >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any objections? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego < >> [email protected] >>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. >> But >>>>>>> now >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>> have some >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. >>>>>>> There >>>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected] >>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? >>>>>>> Can I >>>>>>>>>>> start >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability < >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now >>>>>>> good >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will >> be >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new >>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it >> seems >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest >>>>>>>>>> remaining >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch >> for >>>>>>>> 1.8 >>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>> soon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might >>>>>>>>>> happen? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. >>>>>>> Recently >>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties >>>>>>>>>> related >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation >> versions >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for >> the >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a >>>>>>>> hidden >>>>>>>>>>> page >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible >>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a >>>>>>>> suffix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will >> create >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged >>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>> 1.8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the >>>>>>> overall >>>>>>>>>> merge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML >>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing >> that >>>>>>>>>> before >>>>>>>>>>>> DML >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to >> merge >>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests >>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> examples >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor >>>>>>>>>>> binary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for >> 1.8. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I >> can. >>>>>>>> But I >>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related >>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] >>>>>>>> documentation >>>>>>>>>>>> and be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the >> .NET >>>>>>>>>>> usability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache >>>>>>> Ignite >>>>>>>>>>> users? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who >>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is >>>>>>>> mostly >>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved >>>>>>>> easily). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary >>>>>>>> hash >>>>>>>>>>> codes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 >>>>>>> branch, >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>> ask >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as >>>>>>> follows: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version >> of >>>>>>>> auto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these >> very >>>>>>>>>>> hashing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests >>>>>>> passed. >>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>>>>> GridGain Systems >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>> GridGain Systems >>>> www.gridgain.com >>> >>> >>
