Sergey, your issue has been resolved - apparently a won't fix as it's not an Ignite problem but a (rather rational) H2's behavior :) It was a fun brainteaser before sleep :D Please see details on issue page - it's about arithmetic and type conversions.
Dmitry, yes, I do or modify existing tests where applicable. Latest DML news: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Implicitly cast new column values to expected types on SQL UPDATE - fixed (together with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4333 SQL engine does not preserve metadata about array content's type and 4346 - the one about PHP PDO) - found inner properties mutation problem (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4363 Inner properties mutation broken in SQL UPDATE) - the problem above will most likely be fixed post 1.8 with other issues/improvements related with DML - I've got a (small :) ) list of them and will create proper issues for all that tech debt during the weekend or on Monday. - TC tests seem to be all green on DML side as well as all in all. What's the status of release vote guys? - Alex 2016-12-03 2:08 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for > all the fixes you are making? > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better! >> >> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release: >> >> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the >> result from the right side >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Vladimir, >> > >> > Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it? >> > >> > — >> > Denis >> > >> > > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > Igniters, >> > > >> > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks >> like >> > > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which >> looks >> > > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and >> > > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns. >> > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 >> > > >> > > Vladimir. >> > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Denis, >> > >> >> > >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was >> > already >> > >> resolved >> > >> by another fix made by Alexander. >> > >> >> > >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR. >> > >> >> > >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346 >> > >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347 >> > >> >> > >> Best Regards, >> > >> Igor >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from >> PHP >> > >> PDO >> > >>> side. >> > >>> >> > >>> The first one is related to DML. >> > >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal < >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346> >> > >>> >> > >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue >> before >> > >>> 1.8 is sent for vote. >> > >>> >> > >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. >> > Igor >> > >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well. >> > >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in >> DSN < >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347> >> > >>> >> > >>> — >> > >>> Denis >> > >>> >> > >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Hi >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Update for DML testing: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from >> > >>> previous >> > >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/ >> > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> >> > >> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Vladimir, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature >> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < >> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote >> computation >> > >> is >> > >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here. >> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- >> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < >> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- >> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> — >> > >>>>> Denis >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < >> voze...@gridgain.com> >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Folks, >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable >> tickets >> > >> you >> > >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Vladimir. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov < >> > skoz...@gridgain.com >> > >>> >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three >> > parts >> > >>> in >> > >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see >> > >>>>> following >> > >>>>>>> unclear points >> > >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only >> > >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on >> > >> ignite-cassandra-store? >> > >>>>> In >> > >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module? >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >> > >>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already >> > merged >> > >>> in >> > >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch). >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull >> > >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not >> fixed). >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> - Alex >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com >> >: >> > >>>>>>>>> Hi >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8: >> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send >> > >> message >> > >>>>>>>> because >> > >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/ >> > jira/browse/IGNITE-4304 >> > >>> >> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result >> > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look? >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < >> > >>>>>>> voze...@gridgain.com> >> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks, >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports >> > >> several >> > >>>>>>>> problems >> > >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization >> in >> > >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8 >> > >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for >> the >> > >>> next >> > >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Any objections? >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego < >> > >> isap...@gridgain.com >> > >>>> >> > >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. >> > >> But >> > >>>>>>> now >> > >>>>>>>> we >> > >>>>>>>>>>> have some >> > >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on >> > them. >> > >>>>>>> There >> > >>>>>>>>>> is a >> > >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for >> > >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Igor >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda < >> > dma...@apache.org >> > >>> >> > >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related >> changes? >> > >>>>>>> Can I >> > >>>>>>>>>>> start >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme. >> io/docs/pdo-interoperability >> > < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> — >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is >> now >> > >>>>>>> good >> > >>>>>>>> to >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes >> will >> > >> be >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new >> > >>>>>>>> features >> > >>>>>>>>>> on >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases >> (shortly): >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < >> > >>>>>>> voze...@gridgain.com >> > >>>>>>>>> : >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it >> > >> seems >> > >>>>>>>> that >> > >>>>>>>>>> we >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the >> biggest >> > >>>>>>>>>> remaining >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch >> > >> for >> > >>>>>>>> 1.8 >> > >>>>>>>>>> as >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it >> > might >> > >>>>>>>>>> happen? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < >> > >>>>>>> dma...@apache.org >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. >> > >>>>>>> Recently >> > >>>>>>>>>>> there >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> was >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the >> > difficulties >> > >>>>>>>>>> related >> > >>>>>>>>>>> to >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation >> > >> versions >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for >> > >> the >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to >> create a >> > >>>>>>>> hidden >> > >>>>>>>>>>> page >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it >> > visible >> > >>>>>>>> once >> > >>>>>>>>>> the >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> next >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page >> with >> > a >> > >>>>>>>> suffix >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will >> > >> create >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >> > >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html >> > >>>>>>>>>>> < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >> > >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh >> > >>>>>>>>>>> <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets >> > merged >> > >>>>>>>> into >> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.8 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the >> > >>>>>>> overall >> > >>>>>>>>>> merge >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < >> > >>>>>>>> isap...@gridgain.com> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without >> DML >> > >>>>>>> they >> > >>>>>>>>>> will >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing >> > >> that >> > >>>>>>>>>> before >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> DML >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to >> > >> merge >> > >>>>>>> my >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, >> > tests >> > >>>>>>> and >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> examples >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ptupit...@apache.org >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ptupit...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: >> > >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor >> > >>>>>>>>>>> binary >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode) >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for >> > >> 1.8. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I >> > >> can. >> > >>>>>>>> But I >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 >> < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 >> < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < >> > >>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related >> > >>>>>>> changes >> > >>>>>>>>>> into >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] >> > >>>>>>>> documentation >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and be >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the >> > >> .NET >> > >>>>>>>>>>> usability >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache >> > >>>>>>> Ignite >> > >>>>>>>>>>> users? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 >> > < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 >> > < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < >> > >>>>>>>> dma...@gridgain.com >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone >> who >> > >>>>>>> can >> > >>>>>>>>>> take >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> over >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com <mailto: >> > >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@ >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness >> is >> > >>>>>>>> mostly >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> about >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to >> > specify >> > >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved >> > >>>>>>>> easily). >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after >> > binary >> > >>>>>>>> hash >> > >>>>>>>>>>> codes >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 >> > >>>>>>> branch, >> > >>>>>>>> I >> > >>>>>>>>>>> will >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ask >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live >> > in >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as >> > >>>>>>> follows: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first >> version >> > >> of >> > >>>>>>>> auto >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these >> > >> very >> > >>>>>>>>>>> hashing >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests >> > >>>>>>> passed. >> > >>>>>>>> So >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> could >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >> > >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems >> > >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov >> > >>>>>>> GridGain Systems >> > >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> -- >> > >>>> Sergey Kozlov >> > >>>> GridGain Systems >> > >>>> www.gridgain.com >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Sergey Kozlov >> GridGain Systems >> www.gridgain.com >>
