On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:54PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > > > Would a standard SGA suffice here? > > > > I believe that ASF guidelines suggest that a discussion should happen > > first. Once the community gets enough information, we will move to a PMC > > vote. I was under the impression that once the PMC vote passes, then the > > SGA should be provided. Or does GridGain need to provide a signed SGA > right > > away? > > That reminds me of that Pelosi's self-inflicted conundrum of "In order > to see the bill, we should pass the bill" ;) > Haha :) SGA != code. In my view, the code should be provided to the community for a review. But I am struggling to see why should an SGA be signed prior to the community accepting the donation. Having said that, this is just a technicality, and I believe that GridGain will be able to proceed with the code donation either way. D.
