Denis, Headers are updated, RAT check is passing now.
2017-05-16 2:37 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > The receipt of the software grant (the persistent store) was acknowledged > by Craig Russel. > > Now, we need to move on with this > > > In the meanwhile, I’ve prepared the IP Clearance page referring to the > template below but failed to commit the changes to ASF repo: > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > > > > *Roman S.*, *Cos*, could you help me with this by granting karma or > committing the form from under your account? > > Roman, Cos, could you help with this? > > *Alex G.*, please add Apache 2.0 copyrights to all source files that are > going to be donated. Presently there is no copyright at all. > > Everyone interested please spend some time exploring the store's docs and > sources shared in my previous email. If no one has any concerns I will > proceed with the donation formalities. > > — > Denis > > > On May 12, 2017, at 2:59 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > The repository with the donation is ready and available for review: > > https://github.com/agoncharuk/ignite/tree/pds-donate > > > > Big and main part of the sources is aggregated in “modules/pds”. The > rest, that connects Apache Ignite memory architecture and SQL engine is > under “core” and “indexing” modules. Alex Goncharuk should be able to point > to specific files or commits if required. > > > > Here is a description: > > * Persistent Store Overview: https://cwiki.apache.org/ > confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Overview > > * Persistent Store Internal Design: https://cwiki.apache.org/ > confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Internal+Design > > > > The SGA will be signed and sent on Monday. > > > > In the meanwhile, I’ve prepared the IP Clearance page referring to the > template below but failed to commit the changes to ASF repo: > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > > > > *Roman S.*, *Cos*, could you help me with this by granting karma or > committing the form from under your account? > > > > — > > Denis > > > >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@boudnik.org> > wrote: > >> > >> While no one is suggesting an IP trap laid out in the non-SGA'ed code > >> in this particular case, we don't want to setup a precedent like this. > >> > >> From the overall ASF perspective I +1 what Roman has just said. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> Take care, > >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan > >>> <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:54PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would a standard SGA suffice here? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I believe that ASF guidelines suggest that a discussion should > happen > >>>>>> first. Once the community gets enough information, we will move to > a PMC > >>>>>> vote. I was under the impression that once the PMC vote passes, > then the > >>>>>> SGA should be provided. Or does GridGain need to provide a signed > SGA > >>>>> right > >>>>>> away? > >>>>> > >>>>> That reminds me of that Pelosi's self-inflicted conundrum of "In > order > >>>>> to see the bill, we should pass the bill" ;) > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Haha :) > >>>> > >>>> SGA != code. In my view, the code should be provided to the community > for a > >>>> review. But I am struggling to see why should an SGA be signed prior > to the > >>>> community accepting the donation. > >>> > >>> There's no such thing as SGA without a reference to a code base. > >>> > >>> Also, as I explained -- as a community member I would refuse to look > >>> at the code base that doesn't have a proper licensing attached to it. > >>> SGA established this kind of proper licensing. > >>> > >>> Now, SGA is deinetly not the only way to do so, but it is the easiest > >>> and since you'd have to do it anyway the most convenient for the > >>> community. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Roman. > > > >
