>>  * Twitter module
Every extension/adapter/etc module should be checked to be useful.
My wish is to get rid of all lesser-used features, to make AI as small as
possible.
It's time to clean-up legacy :)

BTW, do we really need TCK support?

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:05 PM Andrey Mashenkov <andrey.mashen...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Alexey,
>
> * SqlQuery (not SqlFieldsQuery)
> * Twitter module
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:52 PM Alexey Goncharuk <
> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Nikolay,
> >
> > Local caches and scalar are already in the list :) Added the outdated
> > metrics point.
> >
> > пн, 17 июн. 2019 г. в 15:32, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > * Scalar.
> > > * LOCAL caches.
> > > * Deprecated metrics.
> > >
> > > В Пн, 17/06/2019 в 15:18 +0300, Alexey Goncharuk пишет:
> > > > Igniters,
> > > >
> > > > Even though we are still planning the Ignite 2.8 release, I would
> like
> > to
> > > > kick-off a discussion related to Ignite 3.0, because the efforts for
> AI
> > > 3.0
> > > > will be significantly larger than for AI 2.8, better to start early.
> > > >
> > > > As a first step, I would like to discuss the list of things to be
> > removed
> > > > in Ignite 3.0 (partially this thread is inspired by Denis Magda's
> IGFS
> > > > removal thread). I've separated all to-be-removed points from
> existing
> > > > Ignite 3.0 wishlist [1] to a dedicated block and also added a few
> more
> > > > things that look right to be dropped.
> > > >
> > > > Please share your thoughts, probably, there are more outdated things
> we
> > > > need to add to the wishlist.
> > > >
> > > > As a side question: I think it makes sense to create tickets for such
> > > > improvements, how do we track them. Will the 3.0 version suffice or
> > > should
> > > > we add a separate label?
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrey V. Mashenkov
>

Reply via email to