Folks, Sorry if I am repeating something. I checked a page [1] and have not found several items. 1. I thought that there was an agreement of dropping OLD service grid, was not it? 2. Also IndexingSpi seems to me as a candidate for removal.
Should I add those items to the page? Or is there another page containing items to be removed that we agreed on? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist ср, 17 июл. 2019 г. в 02:00, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > Alex, Igniters, sorry for a delay. Got swamped with other duties. > > Does it wait till the next week? I'll make sure to dedicate some time for > that. Or if we'd like to run faster then I'll appreciate if someone else > steps in and prepares a list this week. I'll help to review and solidify it. > > - > Denis > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 7:58 AM Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Denis, > > > > Are we ready to present the list to the user list? > > > > вт, 2 июл. 2019 г. в 00:27, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > I wouldn't kick off dozens of voting discussions. Instead, the content on > > > the wiki page needs to be cleaned and rearranged. This will make the > > > content readable and comprehensible. I can do that. > > > > > > Next, let's ask the user community for an opinion. After reviewing and > > > incorporating the latter we can do one more dev list discussion with the > > > last call for opinions. Next, will be the voting time. If there is a > > > feature someone from the dev list is against of removing, then we can > > start > > > a separate vote for it later. But let's get into those cases first. > > > > > > - > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 1:47 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I propose each removal should have separated formal vote thread with > > > > consensus approval (since it is code modification). > > > > > > > > This means a single binding objection with justification is a blocker > > for > > > > removal. > > > > > > > > We need separation to let community members pick up an interesting > > topic > > > > from email subject. Not all members reading carefully each post in > > > > mile-long threads. > > > > > > > > пн, 1 июл. 2019 г. в 11:17, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > +1 to email survey with following types of votes > > > > > - silence (agree with all proposed removals) > > > > > - we have to keep XXX because ... > > > > > > > > > > As a result, will gain lists > > > > > "to be removed" - no one objected > > > > > "can be removed" - single objection > > > > > "should be kept" - multi objections > > > > > > > > > > Denis or Dmitry Pavlov, could you please lead this thread? > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 12:27 AM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would do an email survey to hear an opinion of why someone > > > believes a > > > > > > feature A has to stay. It makes sense to ask about the APIs to be > > > > removed > > > > > > as well as integrations to go out of community support [1] in the > > > same > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Has everyone expressed an opinion? If yes, I can go ahead and > > format > > > > the > > > > > > wishlist page and make it structured for the user thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Modularization-td42486.html > > > > > > - > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 8:54 AM Alexey Goncharuk < > > > > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, good point. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any idea how we can keep track of the voting? Should > > we > > > > > > launch > > > > > > > a google survey or survey monkey? Voting by email? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 28 июн. 2019 г. в 11:24, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank's for keeping an eye on page updates. > > > > > > > > Near Caches is not a bad feature, but it should be used with > > > > caution. > > > > > > > > At least we have to explain how it works on readme.io, why and > > > > when > > > > > it > > > > > > > > should be used because usage can drop the performance instead > > of > > > > > > > increasing > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, I added near caches because I never heard someone used > > > them > > > > > > > > meaningfully, not like a silver bullet. > > > > > > > > So, that's just a proposal :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I'd like to propose to have some voting about full list > > > later > > > > > to > > > > > > > gain > > > > > > > > "must be removed", "can be removed" and "should be kept" lists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:03 PM Alexey Goncharuk < > > > > > > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to pull-up the discussion regarding the near > > > caches > > > > - > > > > > I > > > > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > > > agree this is a feature that needs to be removed. Near caches > > > > > provide > > > > > > > > > significant read performance improvements and, to the best of > > > my > > > > > > > > knowledge, > > > > > > > > > are used in several cases in production. Can you elaborate on > > > the > > > > > > > > > shortcomings you faced? Maybe we can improve both internal > > code > > > > and > > > > > > > user > > > > > > > > > experience? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 21 июн. 2019 г. в 10:42, Dmitry Melnichuk < > > > > > > > > > dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, > > > > > > > > > > As a Python thin client developer, I think that separate > > > > > repository > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > a truly great idea! > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 21:29 +0300, Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > - Move to separate repositories: thin clients (at least > > > > > non-Java > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ones) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin
