Hi Maxim,

It may be reasonable, but probably we should start a separate topic. IMO,
some Igniters (sad, but true) may have spam-filter for TC Bot messages

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

пт, 26 июл. 2019 г. в 17:09, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>:

> Folks,
>
> I've checked some build associated with PRs related to ML and it seems
> to me that the Run::ML suite [1]  does not include the checkstyle
> suite in its workflow. It's a bit strange for me to add checkstyle,
> licenses headers etc. things to each aggregate suite configuration
> that we want to use. As its related to the code directly the general
> question here is - should we make our build procedure more intuitive
> and turn on checkstyle profile for the Apache Ignite Build suite?
> I think the answer is - yes.
>
> [1]
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4381029&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunMl
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 16:54, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Igniters, many thanks for the update on my PR, I didn't merge for a 3
> > months and doesn't know that rules were changed
> > Please, revert my commit, I will update my PR according CheckStyle job
> >
> > Please, tell me, is CheckStyle bot recommendations and changing of PR
> name
> > (with ticket name addition) is enough to finish this issue?
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the clarification
> >
> > пт, 26 июл. 2019 г. в 18:28, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > +1 to revert. Some day we should learn this process. Maybe this day is
> > > today.
> > >
> > > пт, 26 июл. 2019 г. в 10:00, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > >> +1 to revert.
> > >>
> > >> В Пт, 26/07/2019 в 09:48 +0300, Павлухин Иван пишет:
> > >> > Alexey,
> > >> >
> > >> > Actually the commit [1] is very suspicious:
> > >> > 1. Commit message "[ML] Hyper-parameter tuning via Genetic Algorithm
> > >> > (#6713)" does not refer to a ticket.
> > >> > 2. Is there a ticket? Consequently it is not easy to understand what
> > >> > was done and check ticket according to regular flow (review, TC
> run).
> > >> > 3. I skimmed through changes and found several code style violations
> > >> quite soon.
> > >> >
> > >> > Should we revert the commit [1] and apply the changes according to
> our
> > >> > conventions [2]?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/63fbcbf849640edf140047a5111a58f480c95294
> > >> > [2]
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute
> > >> >
> > >> > чт, 25 июл. 2019 г. в 21:26, <dpavlov.ta...@gmail.com>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi Igniters,
> > >> > >
> > >> > >  I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are
> more
> > >> than welcomed to help.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >  If your changes can lead to this failure(s): We're grateful that
> you
> > >> were a volunteer to make the contribution to this project, but things
> > >> change and you may no longer be able to finalize your contribution.
> > >> > >  Could you respond to this email and indicate if you wish to
> continue
> > >> and fix test failures or step down and some committer may revert you
> commit.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >  *    New Trusted Suite failure in master [Check Code Style]
> > >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_CheckCodeStyle&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv
> > >> > >  Changes may lead to failure were done by
> > >> > >          - zaleslaw....@gmail.com
> > >> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewModification.html?modId=888540
> > >> > >
> > >> > >          - Here's a reminder of what contributors were agreed to
> do
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute
> > >> > >          - Should you have any questions please contact
> > >> dev@ignite.apache.org
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best Regards,
> > >> > > Apache Ignite TeamCity Bot
> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot
> > >> > > Notification generated at 21:26:38 25-07-2019
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
>

Reply via email to