Hi Denis,

Sure, since code freeze is planned for today, I don't mind to include this
bug.

Ivan, could you complete this issue by 20 August?

BTW #1, Dmitriy Govoruchnin, please reply about commit for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953?src=confmacro

BTW #2, FYI, release page is now available here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.7.6

BTW #3, FYI, release related test PR is here
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6775 and it's TC Bot report is here:
https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=ignite-2.7.6&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.7.6


чт, 15 авг. 2019 г. в 13:55, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:

> An Ignite user just reported a silly issue that needs to be fixed in 2.7.6:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12068
>
> More details and context:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57479636/simple-select-query-missing-rows-in-ignite
>
> Ivan, please help us to make it to the release.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:47 AM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > IGNITE-12507 (Persistence files are stored to temp dir) has definitely be
> > added the scope and treated one of the main release drivers.
> >
> > Dmitry, please let us know once the release wiki page is ready so that we
> > can finalize the timelines based on chosen scope.
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:12 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone, who participated in the discussion.
> >>
> >> I would like to wait also fix for
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12057
> >>
> >> and discussion results for that issue:
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/498a14b3971950a45ef57f45cc23d2438ce1afba000b586e230927bf@%3Cdev.ignite.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >>
> >> Since some issues are still open, we'll probably move some dates
> forward,
> >> but it seems we managed to discuss scope before scope freeze.
> >>
> >> I consider now the scope is frozen - no new feature can be added to the
> >> scope of 2.7.6. We're entering the rampdown phase.
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >>
> >> See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
> >> for
> >> more details.
> >>
> >> пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 16:37, Zhenya Stanilovsky
> >> <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid
> >> >:
> >>
> >> > Hi al,, i also suggest to append [1], cause it could produce
> >> > CorruptedTreeException in some scenario.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12061
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >Hi all,
> >> > >Can we include  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12060 ?
> >> > This is
> >> > >a  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953
> >> > >
> >> > >On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:04 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> nizhi...@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hello, Deni.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Nickolay, could you check if that's a quick upgrade?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Yes, I will take a look.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> В Чт, 08/08/2019 в 11:08 -0700, Denis Magda пишет:
> >> > >> > Dmitry,
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Please add this BTree corruption fix to the scope:
> >> > >> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Plus, I would upgrade our Spark integration to version 2.4 as
> long
> >> as
> >> > 2.3
> >> > >> > goes with limitations reported by our users:
> >> > >> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12054
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Nickolay, could you check if that's a quick upgrade?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > -
> >> > >> > Denis
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:40 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <
> >> dpav...@apache.org >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > Hi Ivan, Ilya, Igniters,
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I would like this release would be as minimal as possible.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > According to dates proposed we could freeze scope at 12.08, 4
> >> days
> >> > is
> >> > >> more
> >> > >> > > than enough to stand up and say, ‘Hey, I have an urgent fix’.
> But
> >> > it is
> >> > >> > > also ok for me if we decide to have more relaxed dates.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > For now, I suppose the following fixed should be cherry-picked:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11767 (Blocker)
> >> > >> > > GridDhtPartitionsFullMessage retains huge maps on heap in
> >> exchange
> >> > >> history
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10451 (Major
> Bug)
> >> > .NET:
> >> > >> > > Persistence does not work with custom affinity function
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9562 (Critical
> >> Bug)
> >> > >> Destroyed
> >> > >> > > cache that resurrected on an old offline node breaks PME
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > But I will continue to research JIRA.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Sincerely,
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 17:30, Павлухин Иван <
> vololo...@gmail.com
> >> >:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > > What's the scope for this release?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Same question.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On the other hand an idea of 2.7.6 release attracts me
> because
> >> > having
> >> > >> > > > a practice of doing frequent minor releases can help us to
> >> build
> >> > >> > > > reliable and predictable release rails.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:09, Ilya Kasnacheev <
> >> > >>  ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com >:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Hello!
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > What's the scope for this release?
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Regards,
> >> > >> > > > > --
> >> > >> > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:07, Dmitriy Pavlov <
> >> dpav...@apache.org
> >> > >:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Hi Apache Ignite Developers,
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > We seem to be on the same page about 2.8 release, but
> we’ve
> >> > >> started
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > new
> >> > >> > > > > > practice - minor releases, the first release was 2.7.5.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Unfortunately,
> >> > >> > > > > > there is a couple of issues still not fixed in that
> >> release,
> >> > so I
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > would
> >> > >> > > > > > like to propose to prepare one more minor release for
> >> Apache
> >> > >> Ignite.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > I propose my candidacy to be release manager once again.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > I could (of course with help from Peter Ivanov) do some
> >> > >> additional
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > efforts
> >> > >> > > > > > to complete and improve process doc
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > I propose (most optimistic) dates for release stages:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Scope Freeze: August 12, 2019
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Code Freeze: August 15, 2019
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Voting Date: August 22, 2019
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Release Date: August 27, 2019
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > WDYT?
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > If nobody minds, I will create branch 2.7.6 based on
> 2.7.5
> >> and
> >> > >> set up
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > in
> >> > >> > > > > > the TC Bot during the weekend.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Sincerely,
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > --
> >> > >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > >> > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Zhenya Stanilovsky
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to