Currently, we discuss only candidates here, isn't it? This is not a vote?

Also we should ask candidates about their plans, isn't it?

Please, Denis, remind the procedure of voting, if we will have more than 1
candidate?

Ans yet one suggestion: maybe we will rotate every year, and it will be
easy for candidates to plan their work-life balance?

Thanks

чт, 24 окт. 2019 г., 8:44 Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>:

> Hi Igniters,
>
> I would be happy to serve this role, but since my day job current projects
> not related to Ignite, it may cause some delays in replies.
>
> I would give my +1 to both candidates, but I'm concerned how keeping PMC
> Chair inside the company initially donated code to ASF could move the
> community to the new trails. I strongly believe giving more control outside
> and improving diversity always help to find new ways of developing
> solution.
>
> So I, in any case, don't object to Alexey serving this role. But if Alexey
> is more active on the list and if he is not affiliated with GridGain, it
> would be ++1 from my side. For now, I'm not so sure.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> чт, 24 окт. 2019 г. в 03:39, Nikita Ivanov <niva...@gridgain.com>:
>
> >
> > +1 Alexey Goncharuk
> > --
> > Nikita Ivanov
> >
> > > On Oct 21, 2019, at 10:21 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > It’s been almost 3 years since my election as the PMC Chair and I’d
> like
> > > the community to give other PMC members an opportunity to serve in this
> > > role. It’s healthy to rotate the role more frequently and we’re already
> > > due. Though the chair doesn’t have formal power, he/she can bring a
> fresh
> > > perspective and help to navigate the community via trails not
> considered
> > > before.
> > >
> > > Please propose candidates selecting among active PMC members:
> > > https://ignite.apache.org/community/resources.html#people
> > >
> > >
> > > Denis
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Monday, December 5, 2016, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I haven't forgotten. Just got back from a business trip. Will start a
> > vote
> > >> this week.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > dsetrak...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Cos, I will start the vote soon. A bit over occupied with travel and
> > >>> holidays at this moment.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Ok,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This was a great discussion, thanks for the deep insight, Roman!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> looks like this thread has stewed for a while and it is time to
> > [VOTE].
> > >>>> The
> > >>>> following candidates were put forward during the [DISCUSS] (in the
> > order
> > >>>> of
> > >>>> their appearance on the thread):
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  Dmitriy Setrakyan
> > >>>>  Vladimir Ozerov
> > >>>>  Konstantin Boudnik
> > >>>>  Valentin Kulichenko
> > >>>>  Denis Magda
> > >>>>  Branko Čibej
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Considering the number of the candidates I propose to use
> > >>>> First-past-the-post
> > >>>> voting, with a single-round/single winner rules, where the candidate
> > >>>> collecting the most votes (not the majority) wins. [1]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Dmitriy, would you do the honors and start the formal [VOTE]?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-past-the-post_voting
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>  Cos
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:19PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> > >>>>> <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>> While all the candidates suggested so far look good, I would
> propose
> > >>>> Denis
> > >>>>>> Magda as the next PMC chair. His participation in the project does
> > >>>> not only
> > >>>>>> have to do with the code, but also with Ignite project overall,
> > >>>> including
> > >>>>>> website, documentation, new tickets, design, etc.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Sorry to come to this thread rather late, but I wanted to offer a
> > >>>> somewhat
> > >>>>> different perspective that hopefully can help reframe this
> discussion
> > >>>>> a little bit.
> > >>>>> Note, that what I'm about to say is coming from a non-coding (on
> > >>>> Ignite) member
> > >>>>> of the PMC. In fact, I stayed on the PMC after graduation more with
> > my
> > >>>> ASF
> > >>>>> member hat on, rather than as somebody who wanted to directly
> > >> contribute
> > >>>>> to where the technology was going. My concern during your
> incubation
> > >>>> days
> > >>>>> was (and still is!) how well are you guys doing on the community
> > >>>> development
> > >>>>> front.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If you recall, the diversity requirement (the fact that more than
> 80%
> > >>>> of project
> > >>>>> members work for the same company) came up during our graduation.
> > >> While
> > >>>>> it wasn't a blocking requirement it still was a very valid concern.
> > >>>> Monocultures
> > >>>>> are really nasty for open source communities.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I think it would be fair to say that Ignite community hasn't really
> > >>>>> improved much
> > >>>>> diversity-wise since its graduation. And I honestly feel that this
> > is,
> > >>>>> to a larger
> > >>>>> extent, because the focus is now missing. It was well understood
> that
> > >>>> in order
> > >>>>> to graduate the community had to do all it can to demonstrate a
> > >>>>> positive trajectory
> > >>>>> in that direction. And we did. But we kind of dropped the ball on
> it
> > >>>> since.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> With that in mind, I offer my view on what a change in the Chair
> > could
> > >>>>> offer: a renewed
> > >>>>> focus on community growth and development. If you agree with this
> > >>>> premise than
> > >>>>> somebody like Branko or Cos who could act as a forcing function to
> > >>>> constantly
> > >>>>> remind us about what else can we do to grow and develop this
> > community
> > >>>> would
> > >>>>> be an ideal choice for the Chair (after all Branko's "tough love"
> was
> > >>>>> probably the
> > >>>>> most useful part of Ignite's experience in the Incubator).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Now, of course, strictly speaking you don't have to be a Chair to
> do
> > >>>>> that. But lets
> > >>>>> face it -- that helps. And besides, a project's Chair doesn't
> really
> > >>>>> have any special
> > >>>>> powers when it comes to technological consensus, but anything that
> > has
> > >>>> to do
> > >>>>> with external community the VP title that the chair gets can help
> > >> quite
> > >>>> a bit.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Long story short: if Branko or Cos (as former mentors) would like
> to
> > >>>>> commit to 6 more
> > >>>>> months of the same hands-on mentorship focused on community
> > >> development
> > >>>> -- they
> > >>>>> would have my wholehearted support.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Roman (with my PMC member hat on).
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -
> > > Denis
> >
>

Reply via email to