Hi Denis,

I meant we can create dedicated repository for individual extensions and we
can create submodules inside each specific repository for individual
extensions versions.

Regards,
Saikat


On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:14 PM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Denis,
>
> Yes, dedicated repository is also a good idea and we can create submodules
> inside each specific repository for individual extensions.
>
> Regards,
> Saikat
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:34 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> What do you think about having a dedicated repository for each extension
>> instead of a single one? It sounds complicated but might be worthwhile for
>> cases when an integration requires to support several versions. Take Spark
>> or Hibernate as an example, we already provide different versions of
>> Ignite
>> packages for various Spark/Hibernate versions. It will be easier to handle
>> if Spark or Hibernate had their own repos.
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 10:06 PM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Alexey,
>> >
>> > Thank you for your email. Yes, I am also aligned for ignite-extensions.
>> >
>> > If others are also ok we can create the new repository with name
>> > ignite-extensions.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Saikat
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 3:11 AM Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Vote for ignite-extensions (it's more widely than ignite-connectors)
>> > >
>> > > сб, 26 окт. 2019 г. в 05:52, Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello Denis, Dmitriy
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you for your reply. I am thinking when a new repo is created
>> that
>> > > > will not mean that the project will undergo Incubator process , Is
>> > > > this correct?
>> > > >
>> > > > We actually want to just take few of our integrations and release
>> them
>> > > > separately as part of this new git repository. We will continue to
>> keep
>> > > the
>> > > > release group name and artifact name same.
>> > > >
>> > > > I will definitely help drive the initiative to migrate our
>> integrations
>> > > > into this new Ignite Extension repo.
>> > > >
>> > > > I seek help from our community to propose new name for Ignite
>> Extension
>> > > > repository.
>> > > >
>> > > > Some ideas, I have are as follows:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >    - ignite-extensions
>> > > >    - ignite-sidecar
>> > > >    - ignite-ext
>> > > >    - ignite-connectors
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Saikat
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 4:06 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Denis,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > any PMC member can create repository here
>> > > > > https://selfserve.apache.org/
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We just need to select repo names in advance.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sincerely,
>> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > > >
>> > > > > пт, 25 окт. 2019 г. в 23:57, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Saikat, sounds great.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > As long as you're already driving this initiative, could you
>> please
>> > > > check
>> > > > > > with ASF Infra how to put this approach in place? Will we be
>> able
>> > to
>> > > > > create
>> > > > > > several additional repositories for extensions and release them
>> as
>> > > part
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > the Ignite project?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -
>> > > > > > Denis
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:18 PM Saikat Maitra <
>> > > saikat.mai...@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Denis,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Yes, I see it now as I think more about it, I like option -
>> 0. I
>> > am
>> > > > > > > thinking from a new member and a contributor perspective for
>> > Ignite
>> > > > > > > project, I would very much like my PR and proposal to be
>> accepted
>> > > > > within
>> > > > > > > Ignite community.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > > Saikat
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 1:56 PM Denis Magda <
>> dma...@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Exactly, Dmitry found the right word for the reason why
>> > option-0
>> > > > > might
>> > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > the best one - to avoid the Ignite community *split*. All
>> those
>> > > who
>> > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > contributing to integrations and extensions need to be able
>> to
>> > > > earn a
>> > > > > > > > status of an Ignite committer and PMC members. Otherwise,
>> I'm
>> > not
>> > > > > sure
>> > > > > > if
>> > > > > > > > Emmanouil and others to come will be fully involved in the
>> > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > community.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Saikat, Emmanouil, what do you think if to look from this
>> > > > > perspective?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > -
>> > > > > > > > Denis
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:04 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <
>> > > > dpav...@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hah, IMHO, it is a story of how pushing others to place
>> their
>> > > > > > > > contribution
>> > > > > > > > > outside ASF could lead projects to split their
>> communities.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I believe, the Ignite community is more open and flexible
>> in
>> > > that
>> > > > > > > regard.
>> > > > > > > > > So Option-0. is also OK from my perspective.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > чт, 24 окт. 2019 г. в 04:01, Saikat Maitra <
>> > > > > saikat.mai...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I looked into the way Apache Bahir manages their
>> extensions
>> > > for
>> > > > > > Spark
>> > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > Flink and it looks like they are much independent in
>> terms
>> > of
>> > > > > > > managing
>> > > > > > > > > > their releases. They also have separate git repos for
>> > apache
>> > > > > bahir
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > apache bahir-flink.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Releases :
>> > > > > > > > > > https://bahir.apache.org/downloads/spark/
>> > > > > > > > > > https://bahir.apache.org/downloads/flink/
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Repos :
>> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bahir
>> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bahir-flink
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I am thinking if we are following the similar pattern we
>> > can
>> > > > > > create a
>> > > > > > > > > > separate git repo under the Org apache /
>> ignite-extentions
>> > or
>> > > > > > apache
>> > > > > > > /
>> > > > > > > > > > bahir-ignite.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > If most of our integrations are data streaming
>> connectors
>> > > that
>> > > > we
>> > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > > most
>> > > > > > > > > > interested to migrate to separate repository then
>> joining
>> > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > Bahir
>> > > > > > > > > > project and managing independent release cycle will
>> benefit
>> > > us
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > > > > help foster cross community engagement and support. The
>> > > purpose
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > Bahir
>> > > > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > > also to host such extensions as ours.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I was reading this news article and it resonated similar
>> > > ideas
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > have
>> > > > > > > > > > specific to managing release cycles
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > https://thenewstack.io/apache-bahir-gives-spark-extensions-new-home/
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Please review and share your feedback.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Warm Regards,
>> > > > > > > > > > Saikat
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:29 PM Denis Magda <
>> > > dma...@apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Folks,
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > How about considering the option Dmitriy named as "0.
>> > > placing
>> > > > > > > > > integration
>> > > > > > > > > > > in a separate module within space of Apache Ignite"?
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Nothing prevents us from following concepts of Bahir
>> > > project
>> > > > in
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > sense
>> > > > > > > > > > > that we'll be creating and managing separate
>> repositories
>> > > for
>> > > > > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > extensions/modules but those will be governed by the
>> > Ignite
>> > > > > > > community
>> > > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > all the contributors to the extensions will be
>> becoming
>> > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > committers
>> > > > > > > > > > > and PMC members. The more I think about this approach
>> the
>> > > > more
>> > > > > I
>> > > > > > > like
>> > > > > > > > > it.
>> > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > -
>> > > > > > > > > > > Denis
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:42 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <
>> > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Saikat, Alexey,
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Actually we have 3 ways to solve it.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > 0. placing integration in a separate module within
>> > space
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Apache Bahir
>> > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Apache Incubator
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if option 2 is the best one since it is
>> > more
>> > > > > about
>> > > > > > > > > > building
>> > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > new community around Ignite Extensions, it may be
>> > tricky.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > But 0 and 1 seem to be perfectly OK.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > And I like option 1 most since it is very natural to
>> > move
>> > > > > > > > > Ignite-Kafka,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Ignite-Camel to a separate project specially
>> intended
>> > for
>> > > > > > > > > integration.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > So if we stay with option 1 I would be glad to help.
>> > > Count
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > my
>> > > > > > > > > > support
>> > > > > > > > > > > > within the migration to Apache Bahir. Inter-project
>> > > > > interaction
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > integration are usually welcomed in the ASF.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 23 окт. 2019 г. в 09:31, Alexey Zinoviev <
>> > > > > > > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > >:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, dear Saikat Maitra, could you please
>> describe
>> > how
>> > > > you
>> > > > > > see
>> > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > release cycles in Bahir Ignite Extensions and how
>> it
>> > be
>> > > > > > related
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > release, 2.9, 3.0 for example.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your energy
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 23 окт. 2019 г., 8:10 Alexey Zinoviev <
>> > > > > > > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > >:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Please, give me permissions too, I'd glad to help
>> > with
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > modules
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> migration and support part of them in future, but
>> > also
>> > > > we
>> > > > > > need
>> > > > > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > > > > only
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> contributor but a few Committer permissions to
>> merge
>> > > In
>> > > > > > > > repository
>> > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > other
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> side it could be very long proccess.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Could you ask Bahir Community about that?
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> ср, 23 окт. 2019 г., 2:31 Saikat Maitra <
>> > > > > > > > saikat.mai...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > >:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I discussed with Apache Bahir community and they
>> > are
>> > > > > > > interested
>> > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > have
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Apache Ignite extensions as part of Apache Bahir
>> > > > project.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I have also requested for contributor access in
>> > Jira
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > > > Bahir
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> project so that I can create issues and assign
>> to
>> > > > > myself. I
>> > > > > > > can
>> > > > > > > > > > help
>> > > > > > > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> code reviews as well.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Also my thoughts on releases specific to
>> > dependencies
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> is
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> to do a fast follow up release for modules
>> based on
>> > > > > latest
>> > > > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> stable release.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is the email thread for reference
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@bahir.apache.org/msg02703.html
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I wanted to connect and get feedback on the
>> > proposal
>> > > > and
>> > > > > if
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > > > ok
>> > > > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> move the following Apache Ignite Extensions
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization#IEP-36:Modularization-IndependentIntegrations
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Regards,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Saikat
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:44 PM Saikat Maitra <
>> > > > > > > > > > > saikat.mai...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Hello,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > We wanted to discuss on a proposal to move and
>> > > > support
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > integrations as separate Ignite Extensions as
>> > > > discussed
>> > > > > > > here
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Pub-Sub-Streamer-Implementation-td43944.html
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > .
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > The reason we wanted to move our Apache Ignite
>> > > > > > integration
>> > > > > > > as
>> > > > > > > > > > > > separate
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Extensions is this will help us to manage and
>> > > > maintain
>> > > > > > > > separate
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> lifecycle
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > for Apache Ignite integrations.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > All the integrations will continue to be part
>> of
>> > > ASF
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > > > > > > keep
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > supporting and developing in accordance with
>> ASF
>> > > > vision
>> > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > practices.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > We are considering following two choices for
>> > moving
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Extensions:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > 1. Reach out to Apache Bahir community and
>> > propose
>> > > to
>> > > > > > make
>> > > > > > > > > Ignite
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Extensions a separate module as part of Apache
>> > > Bahir
>> > > > > > > project.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > https://bahir.apache.org/
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_announces96
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > 2. Reach out to Apache Incubator community and
>> > > > request
>> > > > > > for
>> > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > new
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> project
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > for Ignite Extensions.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Please review and share feedback on our
>> proposal.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Warm Regards,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Saikat
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to