Sergey, The ticket looks outdated. In fact this is already implemented.
ср, 12 февр. 2020 г. в 11:58, Sergey-A Kosarev <sergey-a.kosa...@db.com>: > Classification: Public > > Hi, Alexey. > I believe it can't be done until in-memory caches will use baseline > topology [1]. > In our case we are using rebalanceDelay for in-memory caches. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8414 > > > Kind regards, > Sergey Kosarev > > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhenya Stanilovsky [mailto:arzamas...@mail.ru.INVALID] > Sent: 12 February 2020 11:33 > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Deprecation of obsolete rebalancing functionality > > > > I know guys who use this setting (may be erroneously) = MAX_INT for real > rebalance delaying (very small sla) grid without persistence. But i don`t > know further algo, may be if backup nodes become extremely small they > creates the same cluster near it. Can ignite simple disable rebalance? > > >Folks, > > > >I want to deprecate some obsolete functionality related to rebalancing. > >Details in [1] > > > >Any objections ? > > > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12662 > > > >-- > > > >Best regards, > >Alexei Scherbakov > > > > > > > > > --- > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you > are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) > please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this > e-mail is strictly forbidden. > > Please refer to https://www.db.com/disclosures for additional EU > corporate and regulatory disclosures and to > http://www.db.com/unitedkingdom/content/privacy.htm for information about > privacy. > -- Best regards, Alexei Scherbakov
