I've dropped GitBox in favour of GitHub — the build [1] has started.

[1] 
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild/6329862

> On 17 Dec 2021, at 13:24, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Petr,
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Yes, I've added changes related to the new release build actions
> (IGNITE-15678, IGNITE-15677). The ignite-2.12 branch seems to be
> working fine, however, at the ignite-2.11.1 the error with "too many
> requests" appears from time to time. Here is an example of such a
> build [1].
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=6329858&buildTypeId=Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild
> 
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 13:20, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Concerning Too many requests error, I see the following problem:
>> 
>> 
>> Your request has been rate limited, as we have detected excessive usage from 
>> your IP or net block:
>> 15.575 SECONDS OF TIME SPENT OVER 120 SECONDS, MAX ALLOWED IS 15.
>> Rate-limits are automatic and reset every two minutes.
>> If you feel this is in error, please contact the Apache Infrastructure Team 
>> at: us...@infra.apache.org.
>> 
>> 
>> Can someone check with them about it, please?
>> 
>>> On 17 Dec 2021, at 13:14, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Permissions updated.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 17 Dec 2021, at 13:09, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Could you please add links to builds that are malfunctioning?
>>>> As much as I see here [1] and here [2] — the release build changed to 
>>>> comply with 2.12 changes that are not merged to 2.11.1
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [1] 
>>>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild/6329822
>>>> [2] 
>>>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_ReleaseBuild/6329824
>>>> 
>>>>> On 17 Dec 2021, at 12:11, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Petr,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you please assist with configuring the Release Teamcity suite that
>>>>> has been changed for 2.x a month ago? These changes haven't been
>>>>> discussed on the dev-list, so I'm not familiar with them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've faced several issues:
>>>>> - the default role for Apache Ignite 2.x (Release) suite is `Agent
>>>>> manager`, however, it seems the right value is `Project developer and
>>>>> queue manager`. I've looked through the documentation pages and
>>>>> doesn't get an idea of how it can be changed.
>>>>> - there was an issue with the Releases_ApacheIgniteMain_GitBoxIgnite
>>>>> that throws `429 too many requests` exception each time a new list of
>>>>> branches is fetched. I've changed the poll interval to 180 sec
>>>>> (default value 60 sec), however, this change doesn't look good from my
>>>>> side. What should I do here?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 22:09, Вячеслав Коптилин
>>>>> <slava.kopti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Check the following links below.
>>>>>> Looks good to me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 20:19, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm OK with this. Let's go through the fastest way we have.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Check the following links below. I'll prepare the vote shortly.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Compare branches 2.11 and 2.11.1:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/compare/ignite-2.11...ignite-2.11.1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The release branch:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.11.1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> JIRA 2.11.1 version:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11.1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/ignite-2.11.1/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 19:30, Ilya Kasnacheev 
>>>>>>> <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I also agree with Stephen. If we wanted to do a stabilization release 
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> should unbound it from this urgent fix.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I wonder why 2.12 is not with us already, given that it was scheduled 
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>> out in August.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 19:25, Вячеслав Коптилин 
>>>>>>>> <slava.kopti...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Given that 2.12 is so close, my preference would be to limit the
>>>>>>> scope of
>>>>>>>>> 2.11.1 to just the log4j update.
>>>>>>>>> I agree with Stephen. Apache Ignite 2.11.1 is an emergency release.
>>>>>>> Using
>>>>>>>>> log4j 2.16 instead of 2.14 is a quite small change that only requires 
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> "sanity" check and can be quickly released. A wider release scope
>>>>>>> requires
>>>>>>>>> full testing, IMHO.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 дек. 2021 г. в 16:03, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I think it is completely possible to move vote/release dates
>>>>>>>>>> significantly forward with keeping the scope. I will take a look at
>>>>>>>>>> the list of fixed bugs more narrowly and exclude some of them that
>>>>>>>>>> require additional verification.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 15:55, Stephen Darlington
>>>>>>>>>> <stephen.darling...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Given that 2.12 is so close, my preference would be to limit the
>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>> of 2.11.1 to just the log4j update. Would that help bring the
>>>>>>>>> vote/release
>>>>>>>>>> date forward?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 Dec 2021, at 12:44, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Ignite Community!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest preparing the Apache Ignite 2.11.1 release and I want
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> propose myself to be the release manager of the minor release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> * RELEASE TIMELINE *
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Scope Freeze: December 16, 2021
>>>>>>>>>>>> Code Freeze: December 16, 2021
>>>>>>>>>>>> Voting Date: December 21, 2021
>>>>>>>>>>>> Release Date: December 24, 2021
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> * RELEASE SCOPE *
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOG4J dependency update
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16127
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> B+Tree Corrupted exception when using a key extracted from a
>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12911
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regression: Ignite node crash(CorruptedTreeException: B+Tree is
>>>>>>>>>> corrupted)
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15943
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> .NET: ClientFailoverSocket sets logger too late, resulting in
>>>>>>> null
>>>>>>>>>>>> loggers downstream
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14776
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The iterator of the ClientCacheQueryCursor can be closed during
>>>>>>>>>> serialization.
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15346
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Possible owners desync when a node is restarted while rebalancing
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15315
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thin client: Tx can fail if there are concurrent tx rollbacks by
>>>>>>>>>> timeout
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15732
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> AssertionError: Unexpected rebalance on rebalanced cluster
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15033
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> JmxMetricExporterSpi throws assertion error on a filtered metric
>>>>>>>>>> unregister
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15252
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ClassNotFoundException on an attempt to invoke service method
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>> Java ThinClient after a cluster failover
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15256
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException on an attempt to create a Java ThinClient
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryConfiguration
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15138
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Type name is not cached on client-side for
>>>>>>>>>>>> OptimizerMarshaller types
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15924
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> select count * returns multiple rows
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14120
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fix StackOverflowError in case if an exception is suppressed with
>>>>>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15716
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to