Checksums are ok Signature is ok rat report looks good sha1sum file looks good, but md5sum still has a weird format. At least now it is easy to validate, so issue for me.
-1 however (sorry) because - top level directory is called incubator-ignite-ce2230b, should be incubator-ignite-1.0, I believe. Also, it'd make sense to name the archive and sum files in the same fashion. This way, once the RC is accepted to the release all you need to do is to rename the directory but the file names will remain the same. Otherwise, if you rename the diretory inside of the archive, you'll get the wrong checksums and would need to redo the Vote technically. Cos On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:14PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > I have uploaded the new RC3 release candidate to: > http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/ignite-1.0.0-RC3 > > The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for RC2: > > 1. Added DISCLAIMER.txt > 2. Added DEVNOTES.txt > 3. Updated NOTICE.txt with section about "org.jdk8.backport" package > released to public domain under creative commons. > 4. Removed "licenses" folder > > Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available > in DEVNOTES.txt file. > > Please start voting. > > +1 - to accept the RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 > 0 - don't care either way > -1 - DO NOT accept RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 (explain why)
