On 13.03.2015 04:42, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Checksums are ok > Signature is ok > rat report looks good > sha1sum file looks good, but md5sum still has a weird format. At least now > it is easy to validate, so issue for me. > > -1 however (sorry) because > > - top level directory is called incubator-ignite-ce2230b, should be > incubator-ignite-1.0, I believe. Also, it'd make sense to name the archive > and sum files in the same fashion. This way, once the RC is accepted to the > release all you need to do is to rename the directory but the file names > will remain the same.
On this point: there's really no reason to put -RC3 in the actual package name or the unzipped directory name if you intend to release without the release-candidate tag. Just call it ignite-incubating-1.0.0.zip (and .zip.asc and .zip.sha1, etc.). Once a release vote passes, the *only* thing that should happen to the files is them being copied to the dist/release repository; no renaming. It's not as if anyone is likely to be confused by the lack of the -RC? tag, because no-one except developers should see the package until it is released. (This ties in with the publishing rules, fwiw.) Alternatively, as I said elsewhere, you can release something as a release candidate, but you have to establish what exactly that means for users in terms of API and ABI compatibility with a "real" release. > Otherwise, if you rename the diretory inside of the archive, you'll get the > wrong checksums and would need to redo the Vote technically. > > Cos > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:14PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: >> I have uploaded the new RC3 release candidate to: >> http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/ignite-1.0.0-RC3 >> >> The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for RC2: >> >> 1. Added DISCLAIMER.txt >> 2. Added DEVNOTES.txt >> 3. Updated NOTICE.txt with section about "org.jdk8.backport" package >> released to public domain under creative commons. >> 4. Removed "licenses" folder >> >> Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available >> in DEVNOTES.txt file. >> >> Please start voting. >> >> +1 - to accept the RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 >> 0 - don't care either way >> -1 - DO NOT accept RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 (explain why)
