On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 07:55AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 13.03.2015 04:42, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Checksums are ok > > Signature is ok > > rat report looks good > > sha1sum file looks good, but md5sum still has a weird format. At least now > > it is easy to validate, so issue for me. > > > > -1 however (sorry) because > > > > - top level directory is called incubator-ignite-ce2230b, should be > > incubator-ignite-1.0, I believe. Also, it'd make sense to name the archive > > and sum files in the same fashion. This way, once the RC is accepted to > > the > > release all you need to do is to rename the directory but the file names > > will remain the same. > > On this point: there's really no reason to put -RC3 in the actual > package name or the unzipped directory name if you intend to release > without the release-candidate tag. Just call it > ignite-incubating-1.0.0.zip (and .zip.asc and .zip.sha1, etc.). Once a > release vote passes, the *only* thing that should happen to the files is > them being copied to the dist/release repository; no renaming.
I believe this is what I said. By directory I meant the one where the files are published. Sorry, if my explanation was convoluted - dealing with some .... @work tonight ;( > It's not as if anyone is likely to be confused by the lack of the -RC? > tag, because no-one except developers should see the package until it is > released. (This ties in with the publishing rules, fwiw.) > > Alternatively, as I said elsewhere, you can release something as a > release candidate, but you have to establish what exactly that means for > users in terms of API and ABI compatibility with a "real" release. > > > Otherwise, if you rename the diretory inside of the archive, you'll get the > > wrong checksums and would need to redo the Vote technically. > > > > Cos > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:14PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > >> I have uploaded the new RC3 release candidate to: > >> http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/ignite-1.0.0-RC3 > >> > >> The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for RC2: > >> > >> 1. Added DISCLAIMER.txt > >> 2. Added DEVNOTES.txt > >> 3. Updated NOTICE.txt with section about "org.jdk8.backport" package > >> released to public domain under creative commons. > >> 4. Removed "licenses" folder > >> > >> Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available > >> in DEVNOTES.txt file. > >> > >> Please start voting. > >> > >> +1 - to accept the RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 > >> 0 - don't care either way > >> -1 - DO NOT accept RC2 as Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0 (explain why) >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
