On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:28AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > As a matter of fact all artifacts that are expected to be deployed > have to have an incubating tag. > > Btw, most of the project I've seen just add it to the artifact > version -- this seems to be the easiest and the most convenient > way. Not sure why you guys decided to mangle the artifact > name itself.
That is a good way for sure, if everything needs to be changed. Changin all artifact names would be too much indeed. Cos > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, it is only about the pom artifact - not the binary ones. > > > > Cos > > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:33AM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: > >> Guys, > >> > >> Ticket says only about top-level pom, but how about all our modules (e.g., > >> ignite-spring, ignite-logj4, ...)? Should they have -incubating label as > >> well? > >> > >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Yup, good catch. The tag is missed. > >> > > >> > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-853 > >> > > >> > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:40AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> > > Hi! > >> > > > >> > > it seems that the version ID in your pom.xml > >> > > is missing -incubating label. Am I missing something? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> >
