Can someone point me to what a <versionId> is? Here are the pom settings for Ignite, what needs to be changed?
<groupId>org.apache.ignite</groupId> <artifactId>ignite-core</artifactId> <version>1.1.0</version> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:28AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > As a matter of fact all artifacts that are expected to be deployed > > have to have an incubating tag. > > > > Btw, most of the project I've seen just add it to the artifact > > version -- this seems to be the easiest and the most convenient > > way. Not sure why you guys decided to mangle the artifact > > name itself. > > That is a good way for sure, if everything needs to be changed. Changin all > artifact names would be too much indeed. > > Cos > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Yes, it is only about the pom artifact - not the binary ones. > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:33AM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: > > >> Guys, > > >> > > >> Ticket says only about top-level pom, but how about all our modules > (e.g., > > >> ignite-spring, ignite-logj4, ...)? Should they have -incubating label > as > > >> well? > > >> > > >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Yup, good catch. The tag is missed. > > >> > > > >> > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-853 > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:40AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > >> > > Hi! > > >> > > > > >> > > it seems that the version ID in your pom.xml > > >> > > is missing -incubating label. Am I missing something? > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > >
