There's no such thing as versionId, but rather the version. In the example below you might consider doing something like:
<groupId>org.apache.ignite</groupId> <artifactId>ignite-core</artifactId> <version>1.1.0-incubating</version> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:48AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Can someone point me to what a <versionId> is? Here are the pom settings > for Ignite, what needs to be changed? > > <groupId>org.apache.ignite</groupId> > <artifactId>ignite-core</artifactId> > <version>1.1.0</version> > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:28AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > As a matter of fact all artifacts that are expected to be deployed > > > have to have an incubating tag. > > > > > > Btw, most of the project I've seen just add it to the artifact > > > version -- this seems to be the easiest and the most convenient > > > way. Not sure why you guys decided to mangle the artifact > > > name itself. > > > > That is a good way for sure, if everything needs to be changed. Changin all > > artifact names would be too much indeed. > > > > Cos > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Yes, it is only about the pom artifact - not the binary ones. > > > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:33AM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: > > > >> Guys, > > > >> > > > >> Ticket says only about top-level pom, but how about all our modules > > (e.g., > > > >> ignite-spring, ignite-logj4, ...)? Should they have -incubating label > > as > > > >> well? > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Yup, good catch. The tag is missed. > > > >> > > > > >> > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-853 > > > >> > > > > >> > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:40AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > >> > > Hi! > > > >> > > > > > >> > > it seems that the version ID in your pom.xml > > > >> > > is missing -incubating label. Am I missing something? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > >
