Hi,

+1


Thanks
--
Zesong Sun
School of Software, Tsinghua University

孙泽嵩
清华大学 软件学院

> -----原始邮件-----
&gt; 发件人: "Jialin Qiao" <qiaojia...@apache.org>
&gt; 发送时间: 2021-10-18 09:29:50 (星期一)
&gt; 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org
&gt; 抄送: 
&gt; 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] ready for release v0.12.3?
&gt; 
&gt; Hi,
&gt; 
&gt; +1 for release 0.12.3
&gt; 
&gt; Thanks,
&gt; —————————————————
&gt; Jialin Qiao
&gt; School of Software, Tsinghua University
&gt; 
&gt; 乔嘉林
&gt; 清华大学 软件学院
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Haonan Hou <hhao...@outlook.com> 于2021年10月6日周三 下午3:20写道:
&gt; 
&gt; &gt; Hi,
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; I see the bug fix prs to rel/0.12 branch have all been merged.
&gt; &gt; Shall we release v0.12.3?
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; BR,
&gt; &gt; Haonan Hou
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; On Sep 23, 2021, at 10:07 AM, Houliang Qi <neuyi...@163.com> 
wrote:
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Hi,
&gt; &gt; &gt; It seems there have one bug fix pr not merged[1],
&gt; &gt; &gt; I think after the pr was merged, then we can release v0.12.3.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; [1] https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/4015
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Thanks,
&gt; &gt; &gt; ---------------------------------------
&gt; &gt; &gt; Houliang Qi
&gt; &gt; &gt; BONC, Ltd
&gt; &gt; &gt; On 09/23/2021 09:15,Haonan Hou<hhao...@outlook.com> wrote:
&gt; &gt; &gt; Hi,
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; It seems that it's over 3 days after this discussion. And more 
bug-fix
&gt; &gt; PRs merged into rel/0.12 branch.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Shall we release v0.12.3 now?
&gt; &gt; &gt; If so, I would like to do the releasing works.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Best,
&gt; &gt; &gt; Haonan Hou
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; On Sep 16, 2021, at 5:47 PM, Xiangdong Huang 
<saint...@gmail.com> wrote:
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Hi,
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; +1 to release a bugfix version that fixes critical bugs asap.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; But as ASF requires any consensus discussion should last 3 days, 
a
&gt; &gt; &gt; tradeoff solution is,
&gt; &gt; &gt; step 1, provide a bugfix solution first, and
&gt; &gt; &gt; step 2, release the bugfix version 3 days later.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; In these 3 days, if some Bugfix PR wants to be released in this
&gt; &gt; &gt; upcoming version, call reviewers in the mailing list
&gt; &gt; &gt; and then we can promote the PR's priority to merge it in time.
&gt; &gt; &gt; But, if the bugfix version is for fixing a critical bug, we will 
do
&gt; &gt; &gt; not wait more after 3 days' discussion (which means the release 
train
&gt; &gt; &gt; will launch on time).
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; So, IMO, considering there is a critical bug, we can discuss 
which PRs
&gt; &gt; &gt; should be released in v0.12.3,
&gt; &gt; &gt; and begin to release v0.12.3 on Saturday.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Welcome to show more suggestions.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Best,
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; -----------------------------------
&gt; &gt; &gt; Xiangdong Huang
&gt; &gt; &gt; School of Software, Tsinghua University
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; 黄向东
&gt; &gt; &gt; 清华大学 软件学院
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Eric Pai <ericpa...@hotmail.com> 于2021年9月16日周四 下午5:05写道:
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Hi,
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; As it's a critical bug fix, a patch version is necessary. +1 for
&gt; &gt; releasing v0.12.3.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Maybe we can publish a release schedule calendar in github or 
some other
&gt; &gt; pages __, thus everyone will know the whole roadmap and milestones.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; 在 2021/9/16 下午4:42,“Jialin Qiao”<qiaojia...@apache.org> 写入:
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Hi,
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Release big version at a fixed schedule is controllable. Bugfix 
version
&gt; &gt; &gt; release could be separated into two:
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Suppose we just released a version.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; (1) If someone fixes a non-critical bug in this version, we 
could start a
&gt; &gt; &gt; discussion:
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; "how about release the next minor version 2 weeks later."
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; This will make everyone comfortable to catch up with the release.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; (2) If someone fixes a critical bug in this version, we could 
discuss:
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; "We just fix a critical bug, how about release now?"
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; ________
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; On this occasion, this could be a critical bug
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; * IOTDB-1693 &lt;
&gt; &gt; 
https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FIOTDB-1693&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf0ab608957a84e09508508d978edf348%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637673785668847486%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=VNoXQ0yDE8QgFpPz1uq%2FJcLcUQIL%2FjykU4kBmyjxm%2FY%3D&amp;reserved=0&gt;
&gt; &gt; fix IoTDB
&gt; &gt; &gt; restart does not truncate broken ChunkGroup bug
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; The restart will leave some dirty data in TsFile, which causes 
the
&gt; &gt; &gt; TsFileSequenceRead to throw an exception.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Therefore, release 0.12.3 is ok from me :)
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Thanks,
&gt; &gt; &gt; —————————————————
&gt; &gt; &gt; Jialin Qiao
&gt; &gt; &gt; School of Software, Tsinghua University
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; 乔嘉林
&gt; &gt; &gt; 清华大学 软件学院
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
</qiaojia...@apache.org></ericpa...@hotmail.com></saint...@gmail.com></hhao...@outlook.com></neuyi...@163.com></hhao...@outlook.com></qiaojia...@apache.org>

Reply via email to