Ok …

So, it turns out that the Thrift folks intentionally updated to Java 11 but 
took that back and the next release should be based on Java 8 again.
So hopefully that will come soon and then we could have a look about 
compatibility of the generated code. I guess if the wire-protocol didn’t change 
there should generally be no reason for it to not be compatible, and if they 
don’t release a major version, usually this compatibility should stay intact 
(if they sort of follow SemVer)

I guess the best path of action would be to do nothing right now … as an 
alternative, we could of course turn on the Java compilation when building 
thrift and to bundle the jar built by that in the assembly.
If we then replace the thrift-lib dependency with a “system” scope dependency, 
we could already do that now. But admittedly I would not be in favor of doing 
that. I would recommend for us to wait for the next official release.

Chris

Von: Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
Datum: Dienstag, 1. August 2023 um 08:29
An: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Updating to a newer Thrift version?
I opened a ticket in their jira. Might even prepare a pr... Shouldn't be too 
difficult.

Chris

Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: 谭新宇 <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 1:57:28 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Updating to a newer Thrift version?

Hi, Chris

In the latest version of thrift, there are some improvements we'd like to make, 
For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5502 will down-cycled 
 "connection reset"  warn logs.

+1 for upgrading thrift.


Thanks
――――――――――――
Xinyu Tan

> 2023年7月31日 19:50,Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 写道:
>
> Hi all,
>
> While working on the cleanup of the build, I noticed we’re working with 
> Thrift in version 0.14.1 however the latest version is 0.18.1
>
> Is there a reason we’re sticking to a two-year older version than the newest?
>
> If not: with the pom-cleanup refactoring it should be a thing of minutes to 
> update this.
>
> Chris
>

Reply via email to