I’m currently preparing the build-tools for 0.19.0. As soon as that’s done, we could simply build iotdb with 0.19.0.0 and simply try it out? I couldn’t find any info on the binary protocol being changed in the release-notes. But I guess simply trying it out should help.
Chris Von: Xiangdong Huang <saint...@gmail.com> Datum: Dienstag, 19. September 2023 um 01:50 An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <dev@iotdb.apache.org> Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Updating to a newer Thrift version? Hi, one more concern, is Thrift v0.19 compatible with Thrift v0.14? (It is better to be compatible for all IoTDB v1.x. ) ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Haonan Hou <hao...@apache.org> 于2023年9月18日周一 18:13写道: > It seems that Thrift 0.19.0 is released and supports Java 8 again. ;-) > https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/master/CHANGES.md > > Best, > Haonan > > On 2023/08/04 10:01:39 Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Ok … > > > > So, it turns out that the Thrift folks intentionally updated to Java 11 > but took that back and the next release should be based on Java 8 again. > > So hopefully that will come soon and then we could have a look about > compatibility of the generated code. I guess if the wire-protocol didn’t > change there should generally be no reason for it to not be compatible, and > if they don’t release a major version, usually this compatibility should > stay intact (if they sort of follow SemVer) > > > > I guess the best path of action would be to do nothing right now … as an > alternative, we could of course turn on the Java compilation when building > thrift and to bundle the jar built by that in the assembly. > > If we then replace the thrift-lib dependency with a “system” scope > dependency, we could already do that now. But admittedly I would not be in > favor of doing that. I would recommend for us to wait for the next official > release. > > > > Chris > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > Datum: Dienstag, 1. August 2023 um 08:29 > > An: dev@iotdb.apache.org <dev@iotdb.apache.org> > > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Updating to a newer Thrift version? > > I opened a ticket in their jira. Might even prepare a pr... Shouldn't be > too difficult. > > > > Chris > > > > Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > ________________________________ > > From: 谭新宇 <1025599...@qq.com.INVALID> > > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 1:57:28 PM > > To: dev@iotdb.apache.org <dev@iotdb.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Updating to a newer Thrift version? > > > > Hi, Chris > > > > In the latest version of thrift, there are some improvements we'd like > to make, For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5502 > will down-cycled "connection reset" warn logs. > > > > +1 for upgrading thrift. > > > > > > Thanks > > �D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D > > Xinyu Tan > > > > > 2023年7月31日 19:50,Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> 写道: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > While working on the cleanup of the build, I noticed we’re working > with Thrift in version 0.14.1 however the latest version is 0.18.1 > > > > > > Is there a reason we’re sticking to a two-year older version than the > newest? > > > > > > If not: with the pom-cleanup refactoring it should be a thing of > minutes to update this. > > > > > > Chris > > > > > >