I think I'd rather look into see whether DN can work with NoSQL DBs (as apparently JDO supports).
But yes, we've never been short of ideas about how to expand the reach of Isis. In fact, we probably have over-reached ourselves in our past trying to encompass too many technologies. For now I'd rather we build up our base user community by focussing on just one or two well known implementations of our core APIs. Love the enthusiasm, though! And its definitely worth floating these ideas; there may be others who want to collaborate on sister projects (eg like apache wicket has its semi-formal wicketstuff project). Cheers Dan On 1 February 2013 12:35, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Another interesting area would be and an alternatives object-store based > on Tinkerpop blueprints. > > If someone ever wants to embark on writing a graph base object store, > Tinkerpop might be the way to go. Looks like Tinkerpop is to the graph > scene what DataNucleus is to the relational DB scene. > > [1] http://www.tinkerpop.com/ > [2] https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki > > Regards, > > Minto > > -- > ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis > Software innovator / renovator > Xup BV > >
