Op 1-2-2013 13:40, Dan Haywood schreef: > I think I'd rather look into see whether DN can work with NoSQL DBs (as > apparently JDO supports). Agreed DN is the easy way out. But currently DN only support 2 graph databases (neo4j and orientDB). Of course is would be possible to have DN support Tinkerpop Blueprints and gain support for a lot more graph database. This is stacking abstraction layer on abstraction layer, but that is of minor importance.
I am more worried about if the DN model properly fits the full capacity of the graph model. I might look into this some day. BTW, my interest in graph database comes from my current assignment where we use Apache projects like Jena, Clerezza and Stanbol. > But yes, we've never been short of ideas about how to expand the reach of > Isis. In fact, we probably have over-reached ourselves in our past trying > to encompass too many technologies. For now I'd rather we build up our > base user community by focussing on just one or two well known > implementations of our core APIs. Don't get me wrong. I don't expect you guys to do anything just because I have some random thoughts. I merely coin up these ideas to test if they do fit and for the mailing list archive. > Love the enthusiasm, though! And its definitely worth floating these > ideas; there may be others who want to collaborate on sister projects (eg > like apache wicket has its semi-formal wicketstuff project). Regards, Minto
