Hi, On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Ard Schrijvers <a.schrijv...@onehippo.com> wrote: > Also still, I really doubt about whether it is feasible to implement > in a performant way
The key performance problem we faced earlier with non-local search indexes was the lack of efficient random access read to the index segments. I believe we should be able to solve that issue with something like a data store implementation that keeps copies of frequently used records on local disk and offers direct random access needed to efficiently implement the Lucene IndexInput API. BR, Jukka Zitting
