Hi, On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com> wrote: > In any case, keeping the index and the persistence in the > same storage simplifies transactional persistence a lot.
Agreed. I believe we can do this equally well (if not better) with Lucene as with any homegrown indexing mechanism. > A microkernel that relies on Apache Lucene even for simple > property/value indexes is not an option in my view. Agreed. I wouldn't put search features in the microkernel. BR, Jukka Zitting
