Right now jclouds.org is in-between and we have no good place to elaborate our pull review process ideas and steps. This is the first context for a wiki. I'd prefer we can have a sanctioned place on ASF as opposed to using gist etc.
In general I don't think we should see this as a threat, but understand your pov. On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, Everett Toews wrote: > I simply have to ask. > > Do we *really* need a wiki? Exactly what problem are we trying to solve > with it? > > I don't have anything against wikis per se. They do always wind up rotting > but that's true of any code or documentation. > > My concern is that effort will go into the wiki instead of improving > jclouds.org. People will add stuff to the wiki "temporarily" or they will > put stuff there because it's easier than doing a PR and going through a > review process for jclouds.org. > > If there's something broken about contributing jclouds.org, let's fix > that. I would rather have jclouds.org rotting a bit less than having both > a wiki and website rotting. > > Everett > > On May 14, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: > > > Hi, folks. > > > > Any preferences on which ASF wiki we should use? > > > > choice a: http://wiki.apache.org/general/ > > choice b: https://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ > > > > -A > >
