Please do, thanks! On Wednesday, May 15, 2013, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Sounds good! > Do you want I take care of infra side @apache ? > > 2013/5/15 Becca Wood <[email protected] <javascript:;>>: > > +1 Sounds good to me. > > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hi, Becca. > >> > >> Thanks for chiming in. So, yeah I don't have a preference, so I'd > defer to > >> the one that seems more fun :) > >> > >> +1 http://wiki.apache.org/general/ > >> > >> How bout it? > >> > >> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, Becca Wood wrote: > >> > >> > I see the transition to Incubator as an opportunity to really spruce > up > >> and > >> > polish our documentation process and practices. I think that a wiki > >> could > >> > be useful to point towards getting started materials for contributors > >> > without disrupting the basic intentions of jclouds.org. The wiki and > >> > jclouds.org can supplement each other harmoniously. I'm not worried > >> that > >> > we'll lose jclouds.org in transition. > >> > > >> > I would be pleased with choice a because of its straightforward > >> > accessibility (plus playing with MoinMoin kind of amuses me). > However, I > >> > can also see a certain appeal to choice b, especially if we do not > >> > regularly maintain the wiki. > >> > > >> > Do you have a preference, Adrian? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected] > >> <javascript:;> > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > Right now jclouds.org is in-between and we have no good place to > >> > elaborate > >> > > our pull review process ideas and steps. This is the first context > >> for a > >> > > wiki. I'd prefer we can have a sanctioned place on ASF as opposed > to > >> > using > >> > > gist etc. > >> > > > >> > > In general I don't think we should see this as a threat, but > understand > >> > > your pov. > >> > > > >> > > On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, Everett Toews wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I simply have to ask. > >> > > > > >> > > > Do we *really* need a wiki? Exactly what problem are we trying to > >> solve > >> > > > with it? > >> > > > > >> > > > I don't have anything against wikis per se. They do always wind up > >> > > rotting > >> > > > but that's true of any code or documentation. > >> > > > > >> > > > My concern is that effort will go into the wiki instead of > improving > >> > > > jclouds.org. People will add stuff to the wiki "temporarily" or > they > >> > > will > >> > > > put stuff there because it's easier than doing a PR and going > >> through a > >> > > > review process for jclouds.org. > >> > > > > >> > > > If there's something broken about contributing jclouds.org, let's > >> fix > >> > > > that. I would rather have jclouds.org rotting a bit less than > having > >> > > both > >> > > > a wiki and website rotting. > >> > > > > >> > > > Everett > >> > > > > >> > > > On May 14, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, folks. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Any preferences on which ASF wiki we should use? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > choice a: http://wiki.apache.org/general/ > >> > > > > choice b: https://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -A > >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >
