On 25/02/15 14:18, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
When will you start the vote..?

Friday if all goes well.  It's been too long as it is.

I had a quick look at some of the outstanding Fuseki 2 issues.

Unfortunately the land of Javascript is still rather mysterious to me..

Given that this will be Fuseki 2.0.0, I will have another go tonight
to at least try to fix JENA-869 (DELETE that doesn't),

That one looks tricky. Even if there is a small fix, it is a symptom of something generally amiss so I think it'll manifest itself elsewhere even if some test cases pass.

I'd rather go for the "delete via UI not yet implemented" approach, get changes after 2.13.0 so they can be then properly tested. "Delete" is to be treated very carefully where data is concerned!

JENA-867
(Active button that doesn't deactivate),

Probably related to JENA-869. The lifecycle of datasets needs checking.

JENA-865 (Example query has broken prefixes)

That looks more likely to be a small localised issue.

---------------------

From my POV, "release early, release often" applies.

I'd like to think that Fuseki 2 is a useful step forwards in the current state. It has some testing in development and seems as robust as Fuseki1 when used in the same way (the java server part).

Fuseki1 is in the release as well.  That reduces risk.

I'm fully expecting new requirements/expectations to come along as it gets more used and that will set priorities and may overtake or significantly modify the existing JIRA. The real world has a tendency of throwing up the unexpected (the "unknown unknowns").

There comes a point when last minute fixes do indeed fix an observed problem but can result in changes elsewhere in unexpected ways.

        Andy



On 24 February 2015 at 18:27, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
== Jena 2.*

Some first thoughts for the next release ...

What number should it be?  We may have have new components:

* OSGi bundle
* Adds Fuseki2 (as 2.0.0); Fuseki1 still there
* jena-elephas?
   (If this works for you, Rob - no strong advocacy either way)
* Anything else I've forgotten.


Final call for Jena 2.13.0.

Everyone - please test development master.



Once the OSGi matter is resolved, everything has settled down, and any
feedback acted on, I'm ready to be RM for the release.

I have a clean copy locally and have it building - the machine has maven
3.2.3 and a direct internet connection to central.

Thanks to Rob's updated process instructions for using git - the "Git
Configuration Issue" warning box was needed.

         Andy

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JENA/Release+Process




Reply via email to