That is useful, and it's undocumented. Is that because it is dangerous (in the sense in which you used the phrase "dubious in terms of spec compliance") or just because we never have documented it?
ajs6f > On Dec 17, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > ARQ.enableBlankNodeResultLabels() > > On 17/12/17 15:39, ajs6f wrote: >> Where? I found nothing documented. >> ajs6f >>> On Dec 17, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 17/12/17 15:19, ajs6f wrote: >>>> Claude-- I'm looking at RDFConnection, but it's an interface. I think you >>>> mean around L220 of JSONInput itself, right? >>>> It looks like SyntaxLabels has some LabelToNode factory methods that might >>>> fit the bill, like createNodeToLabelAsGiven(), but JSONInput doesn't offer >>>> any way to select which method to use. At L195 it uses >>>> SyntaxLabels.createLabelToNode(). >>>> We could thread such a mapping choice all the way through the call stack, >>>> but that seems a bit difficult to me. Maybe we could introduce a Context >>>> setting for this purpose? >>> >>> They already exist!
