We had a similar discussion in the commons list, about issues/commits from GH, GH actions emails, fuzzifier emails, and the last one I think was about dependabot emails? I don't have a strong preference as if the email traffic is too much for me I just create an email filter using a combination of sender/subject/etc to delete or archive unwanted emails :-) so I'd say whatever you think would disturb your work less (as you are probably the most affected by more Jena emails I reckon).
-Bruno On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 04:13, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > IF we are making changes ... what's the preferred email routing? > > GH issues -> issues@jena (new list) > GH pull requests -> pr@jena > GH discussions -> not practical today? > No stable GH API - not INFRA provided > > Or one "github@" list? > > JIRA: > Today - goes to dev@jena > We may have a jira@ list - if so, it's not active. > Options: > leave as-is > route to issues@jena, same a GH issues > route to a separate jira@jena > > I mildly prefer to split the lists out and allow people to file to same > or different folders as the choose. > (I use GH notifications across all my watched repos) > > As most of the traffic on dev@ is JIRA related, I wouldn't mind routing > it to jira@ - it allows people to have all in one place or to split it. > > A dev@ for project discussions and VOTEs will make dev@ significantly > quieter and maybe encourage discussions as they are a little easier to > see and track. (And have to be explain in the board report!) > > Andy > > On 17/02/2022 20:08, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > I think this would be a good experiment, but definitely not the place for > > project decisions to be recorded (if a discussion there generates some > > decision, then we'd still have to move it & document in the mailing list > I > > think). > > We can also ourselves treat GH-issues as a more convenient route for > external issue raising, many of which are specific problems, and keep > JIRA for significant fixes and change of functionality. > > Also - we do have an upturn in JIRA that are questions. Once, that never > happened; now it is happening. Not many but some. > > > But that might increase the user interaction and contribution. Will wait > > for the vote thread :-) > > > > Thanks > > Bruno > > > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 07:28, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > ... > >> == GH issues > ...>> == GH Discussions >
