Hello Sebb, Did you have time to look at 52466<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466>?
Is this feature abandonned ? or restricted to Class renaming (without properties ) which makes it less useful no ? If it can/should be fixed then 52048<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048>could be fixed as well (although it's not very useful I agree, but as 90% of job was done...), otherwise I will close 52048<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048>as won't fix. What's your opinion ? Thanks Regards Philippe On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 January 2012 13:37, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello All, > > +1 for me. > > I vote for a 2.6 looking at number of Improvements done. > > Definitely at least a minor version bump; point releases should be for > bug fixes (e.g. regressions) only. > > > I think there is still one issue in progress > > 52131<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52131>(not > > sure it cannot wait). > > Ye, it can wait. > > > On my side no issue in progress. > > There is the issue of publishing jars to Maven which is currently in > progress. > > The changes document needs to be summarised and expanded, and/or we > need to produce a set of release notes. > > > Regards > > Philippe > > > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de > >wrote: > > > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> at the beginning of December 2011 we discussed, whether we should have a > >> release soon. I think the overall opinion was "yes" but it seems the > >> project is still busy with fixing things and adding enhancements. > >> Nevertheless I have the impression there are now enough changes to > warrant > >> the next release and get all the nice new stuff out in users hands. I > don't > >> know whether it should be a 2.5.2 or 2.6 though. > >> > >> Kudos to all the effort you put into JMeter! > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Rainer > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
