On 20 March 2012 20:29, Geoff Simmons <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 3/20/12 8:09 PM, Shmuel Krakower wrote: >> >> One other thing I find problematic is that you cannot change the >> created load. I.e. if you want to see how the system will handle >> twice of the current load.. but I guess you can work around this.. > > There are a number of things you could do, such as make additional > copies of the request logs, and change the intervals between requests > in the logs. Then you'd have to make sure that the results do not > create some sort of error, for example by duplicating DB updates, or > something like that. This all runs afoul of the idea of reproducing > recorded traffic, but the sampler doesn't know or care where the > request logs came from or how they were built. > >> Regarding your thoughts of allowing utilization of JMeter config >> elements like cookies, I guess that another approach (which maybe >> others already implemented?) will be to simply convert apache logs >> into jmeter samplers(creating a jmx file) but I am not sure how >> jmeter will handle thousands of samplers in one script. > > As sebb mentioned, that's the Access Log Samper (just the one sampler > is enough). As I mentioned earlier, access logs mean that you are > limited to GET requests and any headers the access log contains, and > you have to estimate the concurrency of the logged requests.
I meant that the Access Log sampler could be extended to parse other logs which have sufficient info to recreate requests other than just GET and HEAD. >> Anyway, this is interesting topic.. maybe more related to the users >> list and not dev... > > We can take it over there, it just came up on dev because we've > offered the sampler for JMeter, and the question was how generally > useful it would be. > > - From the feedback so far, I'm thinking we should bring it up again at > a later time, when we have stronger tool support for obtaining the > request logs, and easier ways of solving problems with sessions and > the like, as we've been discussing today. Sound about right? > > > Best, > Geoff > - -- > UPLEX Systemoptimierung > Schwanenwik 24 > 22087 Hamburg > http://uplex.de/ > Mob: +49-176-63690917 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPaOimAAoJEOUwvh9pJNURNqsP/2icBAvw++TqSOTXTPtqjvt5 > M9SetlBcNqkMmV/HgzQKVHTB+GBqX/d0GREdjHV4bFM8/OuB5uTF7fAshxMOece6 > +/ep6QmKY/LNLnNBgLeOH5NzU8Q4EDLxePf0ei3Lx0HOZRPnkSJc85dStsIUb3pq > pYP4LOjLhkdeVkOy9K5z4cWe402hmzW2AcSfnV6Z4G2DbO1CQXBZNSjV+Cv3juBN > IZEEDMyjkR2/OOcZdW+iTMFJiSRqT5AwoOnr7uQQ7ewd+QBoGdtRE9FI3KxVN4iD > WlACCVwqg+qBCyTOAVIjH+4Rs4H9AzF2bljhnVzGAGyf057/jwu44NgujoWPV4w3 > 75ZG18aRvCffZ5jaIv4u9HEKKyFtXgfgGkLtH4zKKCOGcW1hVdTY9dqB3fKg7EJh > Zgss6WJi2gp9Z+1gJp86NGzn0YzA+KB4r+bwtSbLXcDbNUuicogyg/NAjR808Zt7 > KdG+0zXYkIMU6hWX9b0qy8f9OO+KbUzuvt4OivIFHPjvzfItpURTMZCdkCn5m+Wp > czg+tNGN6ST7U3LkgRC6AhKXRc7Q1ZQgqpiNh2mvGIvjUhj5CA6jLhFDvUSGAOID > SrKO+9XYl5es/M/fHDqPoF/d1J7SatUOCOYTnFy0p1PCFFJLP0qbhEYnqjd+HVoh > XvTTV5Wz7Mts+IF0uX7K > =J2op > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
