Hello, Am I wrong to think that we are now nearly ready to start a release , I see those remaining issues: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 : Sebb is waiting for feedback. I provided mine https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 : Sebb fixed the issue. We had a discussion on the BackendListener. It's not a blocker for me
The last other issues are all related to documentation. If we agree to start the release process I can start working on New and Noteworthy section and update some screenshots. We are now more than 1 year from 2.13 release, I think it's time for a release. Thoughts ? Regards Philippe On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi sebb, >> > I have fixed 1/4 issues reported in 59173 and think other "issues" >> should >> > be mentioned in changes and not fixed as I think some cannot be without >> > important work without real ROI. >> >> ? cannot parse. >> > I don't understand. > Can you read my comment > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173#c4 > >> >> > Regarding 58832, it's a minor issue without effect as report works and >> > displays fine under ff, chrome, safari and IE and generation works fine >> on >> > windows, linux and macosx. >> > So unless you have an issue with it that you clearly find as blocker I >> > don't think it should delay release. >> >> I've already renamed the files and marked the bug fixed. >> > > Great I missed it. > >> >> > Can you answer my question on output report in the bugzilla your >> reopened ? >> > so that I can proceed withfix ? >> >> What question? >> > > The one in this big thread: > "for the output of reports, check that if -o is not used the default > target folder is not overwritten if not empty. I propose to delay other > propositions to next 3.1 and wait for user feedback. I can take it unless > sebb you want to " > > > >> > Finally regarding the order of columns in the Save configuration, you >> > commited something but issue is not in changes nor resolved, what's the >> > status on it ? >> >> Waiting for review to see if the order is sensible or not. >> We don't want to change it unnecessarily later. >> > Ok > >> >> Also note that various new jars need to be mentioned in LICENSE. >> > Fixed > >> This assumes that their licenses are compatible; I've not seen any >> analysis of them. >> > Yes, analysis was made but I forgot to add the license for asm, done now > >> >> > Thanks >> > >> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> There are some regressions/new bugs: >> >> >> >> Bug 59173 >> >> >> >> Bug 58832 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 16 March 2016 at 19:16, Philippe Mouawad < >> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >> >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > Hi sebb, >> >> > With the last commits and comments on the issues you mentioned, >> >> > can we consider that remaining work is the following: >> >> > - sort the columns of saved columns per english translation : you >> seem to >> >> > be handling it >> >> > - for the output of reports, check that if -o is not used the default >> >> > target folder is not overwritten if not empty. I propose to delay >> other >> >> > propositions to next 3.1 and wait for user feedback. I can take it >> unless >> >> > sebb you want to >> >> > - fix the NTLM auth issue with https: Felix can you confirm you will >> be >> >> > able to fix it in a not too big delay ? >> >> > - screenshots for all modified elements, volunteers ? >> >> > - new and noteworthy section, I can start it >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > We're now 1 year since we released 2.13, I think users are waiting >> this >> >> 3.0 >> >> > . >> >> > >> >> > I am as a user >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks >> >> > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016, Philippe Mouawad < >> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >> >> <javascript:;>> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Felix Schumacher < >> >> >> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de <javascript:;> >> >> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumac...@internetallee.de >> >> <javascript:;>');>> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Am 14. März 2016 21:58:50 MEZ, schrieb Philippe Mouawad < >> >> >>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.moua...@gmail.com >> >> <javascript:;>');>>: >> >> >>> >On Monday, March 14, 2016, Felix Schumacher < >> >> >>> >felix.schumac...@internetallee.de <javascript:;> >> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumac...@internetallee.de >> >> <javascript:;>');>> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> Am 14.03.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> Hello, >> >> >>> >>> All remaining issues before 3.0 are now fixed. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1712 >> >> >>> >> means that we can't do kerberos with https. Is this a big >> problem? >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >are we able to workaround in jmeter the issue ? >> >> >>> >If not it would mean we have to wait for a 4.5.3 >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >It does not seem critical for me but I don't know >> >> >>> >> >> >>> We could work around it. We would have to subclass two classes. >> >> >>> SPnegoScheme and its factory. >> >> >>> >> >> >> Let's do that Felix if you think we need to fix it before 3.0. >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> The problem is fixed in httpclients trunk, but I don't know when a >> next >> >> >>> release is planned. >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.5.2 was just released, I doubt a new one will be released for >> such a >> >> bug >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Felix >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Felix >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Except for the documentation screenshots everything is ready >> for a >> >> >>> >>> release. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> When do we launch the release of 3.0 ? >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Regards >> >> >>> >>> Philippe >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org >> >> <javascript:;> >> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milam...@apache.org >> <javascript:;>');>> >> >> >>> >wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> On 08/03/2016 23:02, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> @Milamber, do you intend to take into account before 3.0 >> release >> >> >>> >the >> >> >>> >>>>> notes >> >> >>> >>>>> from Benoit Wiart: >> >> >>> >>>>> -https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426 >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Not before the 3.0. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> If not, I suggest we close this one and open a new one to >> complete >> >> >>> >HiDPI >> >> >>> >>>>> support in 3.1 >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> That seems a good idea. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Milamber >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Cordialement. >> >> >> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Cordialement. >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cordialement. >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
