Are there any remaining issues with the latest version of HC? I've not really been following that much.
On 24 March 2016 at 21:40, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > Am I wrong to think that we are now nearly ready to start a release , I see > those remaining issues: > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 : Sebb is waiting for > feedback. I provided mine > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 : Sebb fixed the > issue. We had a discussion on the BackendListener. It's not a blocker for me > > The last other issues are all related to documentation. > > If we agree to start the release process I can start working on New and > Noteworthy section and update some screenshots. > > We are now more than 1 year from 2.13 release, I think it's time for a > release. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > Philippe > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi sebb, >>> > I have fixed 1/4 issues reported in 59173 and think other "issues" >>> should >>> > be mentioned in changes and not fixed as I think some cannot be without >>> > important work without real ROI. >>> >>> ? cannot parse. >>> >> I don't understand. >> Can you read my comment >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173#c4 >> >>> >>> > Regarding 58832, it's a minor issue without effect as report works and >>> > displays fine under ff, chrome, safari and IE and generation works fine >>> on >>> > windows, linux and macosx. >>> > So unless you have an issue with it that you clearly find as blocker I >>> > don't think it should delay release. >>> >>> I've already renamed the files and marked the bug fixed. >>> >> >> Great I missed it. >> >>> >>> > Can you answer my question on output report in the bugzilla your >>> reopened ? >>> > so that I can proceed withfix ? >>> >>> What question? >>> >> >> The one in this big thread: >> "for the output of reports, check that if -o is not used the default >> target folder is not overwritten if not empty. I propose to delay other >> propositions to next 3.1 and wait for user feedback. I can take it unless >> sebb you want to " >> >> >> >>> > Finally regarding the order of columns in the Save configuration, you >>> > commited something but issue is not in changes nor resolved, what's the >>> > status on it ? >>> >>> Waiting for review to see if the order is sensible or not. >>> We don't want to change it unnecessarily later. >>> >> Ok >> >>> >>> Also note that various new jars need to be mentioned in LICENSE. >>> >> Fixed >> >>> This assumes that their licenses are compatible; I've not seen any >>> analysis of them. >>> >> Yes, analysis was made but I forgot to add the license for asm, done now >> >>> >>> > Thanks >>> > >>> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> There are some regressions/new bugs: >>> >> >>> >> Bug 59173 >>> >> >>> >> Bug 58832 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 16 March 2016 at 19:16, Philippe Mouawad < >>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>> >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>> >> > Hi sebb, >>> >> > With the last commits and comments on the issues you mentioned, >>> >> > can we consider that remaining work is the following: >>> >> > - sort the columns of saved columns per english translation : you >>> seem to >>> >> > be handling it >>> >> > - for the output of reports, check that if -o is not used the default >>> >> > target folder is not overwritten if not empty. I propose to delay >>> other >>> >> > propositions to next 3.1 and wait for user feedback. I can take it >>> unless >>> >> > sebb you want to >>> >> > - fix the NTLM auth issue with https: Felix can you confirm you will >>> be >>> >> > able to fix it in a not too big delay ? >>> >> > - screenshots for all modified elements, volunteers ? >>> >> > - new and noteworthy section, I can start it >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > We're now 1 year since we released 2.13, I think users are waiting >>> this >>> >> 3.0 >>> >> > . >>> >> > >>> >> > I am as a user >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks >>> >> > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016, Philippe Mouawad < >>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>> >> <javascript:;>> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Felix Schumacher < >>> >> >> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de <javascript:;> >>> >> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumac...@internetallee.de >>> >> <javascript:;>');>> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Am 14. März 2016 21:58:50 MEZ, schrieb Philippe Mouawad < >>> >> >>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >>> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>> >> <javascript:;>');>>: >>> >> >>> >On Monday, March 14, 2016, Felix Schumacher < >>> >> >>> >felix.schumac...@internetallee.de <javascript:;> >>> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumac...@internetallee.de >>> >> <javascript:;>');>> >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> >> Am 14.03.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >> >>> >>> All remaining issues before 3.0 are now fixed. >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1712 >>> >> >>> >> means that we can't do kerberos with https. Is this a big >>> problem? >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> >are we able to workaround in jmeter the issue ? >>> >> >>> >If not it would mean we have to wait for a 4.5.3 >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> >It does not seem critical for me but I don't know >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> We could work around it. We would have to subclass two classes. >>> >> >>> SPnegoScheme and its factory. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> Let's do that Felix if you think we need to fix it before 3.0. >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> The problem is fixed in httpclients trunk, but I don't know when a >>> next >>> >> >>> release is planned. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> 4.5.2 was just released, I doubt a new one will be released for >>> such a >>> >> bug >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Felix >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Felix >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Except for the documentation screenshots everything is ready >>> for a >>> >> >>> >>> release. >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> When do we launch the release of 3.0 ? >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Regards >>> >> >>> >>> Philippe >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org >>> >> <javascript:;> >>> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milam...@apache.org >>> <javascript:;>');>> >>> >> >>> >wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 08/03/2016 23:02, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> @Milamber, do you intend to take into account before 3.0 >>> release >>> >> >>> >the >>> >> >>> >>>>> notes >>> >> >>> >>>>> from Benoit Wiart: >>> >> >>> >>>>> -https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426 >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Not before the 3.0. >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> If not, I suggest we close this one and open a new one to >>> complete >>> >> >>> >HiDPI >>> >> >>> >>>>> support in 3.1 >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> That seems a good idea. >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Milamber >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> Cordialement. >>> >> >> Philippe Mouawad. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Cordialement. >>> >> > Philippe Mouawad. >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Cordialement. >>> > Philippe Mouawad. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cordialement. >> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
