Hello,
Nothing I am aware of. I've been tracking those items closely.
Regards

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:45 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Are there any remaining issues with the latest version of HC?
> I've not really been following that much.
>
> On 24 March 2016 at 21:40, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Am I wrong to think that we are now nearly ready to start a release , I
> see
> > those remaining issues:
> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 : Sebb is waiting
> for
> > feedback. I provided mine
> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 : Sebb fixed the
> > issue. We had a discussion on the BackendListener. It's not a blocker
> for me
> >
> > The last other issues are all related to documentation.
> >
> > If we agree to start the release process I can start working on New and
> > Noteworthy section and update some screenshots.
> >
> > We are now more than 1 year from 2.13 release, I think it's time for a
> > release.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Philippe
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Hi sebb,
> >>> > I have fixed 1/4 issues reported in 59173 and think other "issues"
> >>> should
> >>> > be mentioned in changes and not fixed as I think some cannot be
> without
> >>> > important work without real ROI.
> >>>
> >>> ? cannot parse.
> >>>
> >> I don't understand.
> >> Can you read my comment
> >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173#c4
> >>
> >>>
> >>> > Regarding 58832, it's a minor issue without effect as report works
> and
> >>> > displays fine under ff, chrome, safari and IE and generation works
> fine
> >>> on
> >>> > windows, linux and macosx.
> >>> > So unless you have an issue with it that you clearly find as blocker
> I
> >>> > don't think it should delay release.
> >>>
> >>> I've already renamed the files and marked the bug fixed.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Great I missed it.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> > Can you answer my question on output report in the bugzilla your
> >>> reopened ?
> >>> > so that I can proceed withfix ?
> >>>
> >>> What question?
> >>>
> >>
> >> The one in this big thread:
> >> "for the output of reports, check that if -o is not used the default
> >> target folder is not overwritten if not empty. I propose to delay other
> >> propositions to next 3.1 and wait for user feedback. I can take it
> unless
> >> sebb you want to "
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> > Finally regarding the order of columns in the Save configuration, you
> >>> > commited something but issue is not in changes nor resolved, what's
> the
> >>> > status on it ?
> >>>
> >>> Waiting for review to see if the order is sensible or not.
> >>> We don't want to change it unnecessarily later.
> >>>
> >> Ok
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Also note that various new jars need to be mentioned in LICENSE.
> >>>
> >> Fixed
> >>
> >>> This assumes that their licenses are compatible; I've not seen any
> >>> analysis of them.
> >>>
> >> Yes, analysis was made but I forgot to add the license for asm, done now
> >>
> >>>
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> There are some regressions/new bugs:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Bug 59173
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Bug 58832
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On 16 March 2016 at 19:16, Philippe Mouawad <
> >>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com
> >>> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>> >> > Hi sebb,
> >>> >> > With the last commits and comments on the issues you mentioned,
> >>> >> > can we consider that remaining work is the following:
> >>> >> > - sort the columns of saved columns per english translation : you
> >>> seem to
> >>> >> > be handling it
> >>> >> > - for the output of reports, check that if -o is not used the
> default
> >>> >> > target folder is not overwritten if not empty. I propose to delay
> >>> other
> >>> >> > propositions to next 3.1 and wait for user feedback. I can take it
> >>> unless
> >>> >> > sebb you want to
> >>> >> > - fix the NTLM auth issue with https: Felix can you confirm you
> will
> >>> be
> >>> >> > able to fix it in a not too big delay ?
> >>> >> > - screenshots for all modified elements, volunteers ?
> >>> >> > - new and noteworthy section, I can start it
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > We're now 1 year since we released 2.13, I think users are waiting
> >>> this
> >>> >> 3.0
> >>> >> > .
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I am as a user
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Thanks
> >>> >> > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <
> >>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com
> >>> >> <javascript:;>>
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> >>> >> >> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de <javascript:;>
> >>> >> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
> >>> >> <javascript:;>');>>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> Am 14. März 2016 21:58:50 MEZ, schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >>> >> >>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >>> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.moua...@gmail.com
> >>> >> <javascript:;>');>>:
> >>> >> >>> >On Monday, March 14, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
> >>> >> >>> >felix.schumac...@internetallee.de <javascript:;>
> >>> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
> >>> >> <javascript:;>');>>
> >>> >> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >> Am 14.03.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>> Hello,
> >>> >> >>> >>> All remaining issues before 3.0 are now fixed.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1712
> >>> >> >>> >> means that we can't do kerberos with https. Is this a big
> >>> problem?
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >are we able to workaround in jmeter the issue ?
> >>> >> >>> >If not it would mean we have to wait for a 4.5.3
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >It does not seem critical for me but I don't know
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> We could work around it. We would have to subclass two classes.
> >>> >> >>> SPnegoScheme and its factory.
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> Let's do that Felix if you think we need to fix it before 3.0.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> The problem is fixed in httpclients trunk, but I don't know
> when a
> >>> next
> >>> >> >>> release is planned.
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> 4.5.2 was just released, I doubt a new one will be released for
> >>> such a
> >>> >> bug
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> Felix
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >> Felix
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> Except for the documentation screenshots everything is ready
> >>> for a
> >>> >> >>> >>> release.
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> When do we launch the release of 3.0 ?
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> Regards
> >>> >> >>> >>> Philippe
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Milamber <
> milam...@apache.org
> >>> >> <javascript:;>
> >>> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milam...@apache.org
> >>> <javascript:;>');>>
> >>> >> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>> On 08/03/2016 23:02, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>> @Milamber, do you intend to take into account before 3.0
> >>> release
> >>> >> >>> >the
> >>> >> >>> >>>>> notes
> >>> >> >>> >>>>> from Benoit Wiart:
> >>> >> >>> >>>>> -https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58426
> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>>> Not before the 3.0.
> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>> If not, I suggest we close this one and open a new one to
> >>> complete
> >>> >> >>> >HiDPI
> >>> >> >>> >>>>> support in 3.1
> >>> >> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>>> That seems a good idea.
> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>> Milamber
> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>>
> >>> >> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> Cordialement.
> >>> >> >> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > --
> >>> >> > Cordialement.
> >>> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Cordialement.
> >>> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cordialement.
> >> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>



-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to