On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:20 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > Also the actual file names covered by the licenses need to be mentioned. >
Can you be more explicit or do it ? I don't understand. Is the folder enough ? > > Note that the binary LICENSE section includes the full jar name, > including the .jar. > The source section needs to do likewise. > > There may need to be some updates to the unit test to deal with the > source licenses. > > On 19 April 2016 at 11:02, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > These are *source* files so the licenses belong under license/src. > > > > Also the final section of the main LICENSE file is intended for > > binary-only code. > > (It's not all that obvious at present) > > > > On 19 April 2016 at 07:33, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi sebb, > >> I filled in in root LICENSE file the license information for the 4 > >> components. > >> Do we need to also add the MIT license in license/bin folder ? > >> Thanks > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 19 April 2016 at 01:32, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > On 17 April 2016 at 18:03, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> Hello, > >>> >> > >>> >> The second release candidate for JMeter 3.0 (r1739623) has been > >>> prepared, > >>> >> and your votes are solicited. > >>> >> > >>> >> This release brings a lot of new features (over 100) and fixes many > bugs > >>> >> (60). > >>> >> > >>> >> If you can, some tests of this release candidate (load tests and/or > >>> >> functional tests) with Java 7/8 on Linux/Windows/Mac OS on changes > are > >>> >> welcome. > >>> >> > >>> >> You can read the New and Noteworthy section with some screenshots to > >>> >> illustrate improvements and full list of changes at: > >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/changes.html > >>> >> > >>> >> JMeter is a Java desktop application designed to load test > functional > >>> >> behavior and measure performance. The current version is targeted at > >>> Java > >>> >> 7+. > >>> >> > >>> >> Archives/hashes/sigs: > >>> >> > >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jmeter/v3.0_RC2/ > >>> > > >>> > FTR, the revision is: r13285 > >>> > > >>> >> RAT report: > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/dist/rat-report-jmeter-3.0RC2.txt > >>> >> > >>> >> MD5 hashes of archives for this vote: > >>> >> > >>> >> 8eab13c7c97cae7ad981adce73feaf7c *apache-jmeter-3.0.tgz > >>> >> 0375b7ad7fb51698f647ab2d8649b242 *apache-jmeter-3.0.zip > >>> >> 792fb612c2a8de5b4352579fcf4d09be *apache-jmeter-3.0_src.zip > >>> >> 823b8257824644837ec451e025d293d4 *apache-jmeter-3.0_src.tgz > >>> >> > >>> >> Site Docs are here: > >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/ > >>> >> > >>> >> Maven staging repository is accessible here: > >>> >> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejmeter-1007/org/apache/jmeter/ > >>> >> > >>> >> Tag: > >>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/tags/v3_0_RC2/ > >>> >> > >>> >> Keys are here: > >>> >> https://www.apache.org/dist/jmeter/KEYS > >>> >> > >>> >> N.B. > >>> >> To download the dependencies: "ant download_jars" > >>> >> > >>> >> To create the jars and test JMeter: "ant package test". > >>> >> > >>> >> JMeter 3.0 requires Java 7 or later to run. > >>> >> > >>> >> Some known issues and incompatible changes are listed on changes > page. > >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/changes.html > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> All feedback and vote are welcome. > >>> >> > >>> >> [ ] +1 I support this release > >>> >> [ ] +0 I am OK with this release > >>> >> [ ] -0 OK, but.... > >>> >> [X] -1 I do not support this release (please indicate why) > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > (binding) > >>> > > >>> > Sorry but there are some files missing from the source archive: > >>> > > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: .gitignore > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: .svn > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: .travis.yml > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7: LICENSE > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/bootstrap: > >>> > LICENSE > >>> > Only in > >>> > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/bootstrap-social: > >>> > .gitignore > >>> > Only in > >>> > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/datatables-responsive: > >>> > .gitignore > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/flot: > >>> > .gitignore > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/flot: > >>> > Makefile > >>> > Only in > >>> > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/font-awesome: > >>> > .gitignore > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs: > >>> > .gitattributes > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs: > >>> > .gitignore > >>> > Only in > >>> > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs/test: > >>> > .gitignore > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/metisMenu: > >>> > LICENSE > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/mocha: > >>> > LICENSE > >>> > Only in > >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/morrisjs: > >>> > .gitignore > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: checkstyle-suppressions.xml > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: doap_JMeter.rdf > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: api > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: doc > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: ext > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: junit > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: rat-excludes.txt > >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/test: resources > >>> > > >>> > The .* files are OK, as is the doap (we ought to move that) > >>> > Also the lib subdirectories. > >>> > > >>> > But the rest ought to be in the source archives, or some should > >>> > perhaps be dropped from SVN > >>> > >>> The LICENSE files are misplaced. > >>> > >>> The software items need to be mentioned in the main LICENSE file, and > >>> stored under the licenses/ folder if necessary. > >>> > >>> It's important that the user does not have to go looking for LICENSE > >>> files; they need to be all included or referenced from the top level > >>> file. > >>> > >>> > >>> > Also the source archives don't agree: docs is missing from the zip > file > >>> > > >>> > Maybe we don't actually need to store the docs tree in SVN but if we > >>> > do it should be in both the source archives. > >>> > > >>> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > >>> >> > >>> >> The PMC members please indicate the mention "(binding)" with your > vote. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Note: If the vote passes, the intention is to release the archive > files > >>> >> and rename the RC tag as the release tag. > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks in advance! > >>> >> > >>> >> Milamber > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cordialement. > >> Philippe Mouawad. > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
