On 19 April 2016 at 11:30, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:20 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also the actual file names covered by the licenses need to be mentioned. >> > > Can you be more explicit or do it ? > I don't understand. > Is the folder enough ?
The user must be able to identify all the external files and their licenses. In the case of a jar, the jar name is sufficient. For source files it depends on how the files are grouped. I don't know which files are under which license. BTW, it looks as though Start BootStrap is now MIT and the author has moved to a new company so the README is out of date. >> >> Note that the binary LICENSE section includes the full jar name, >> including the .jar. >> The source section needs to do likewise. >> >> There may need to be some updates to the unit test to deal with the >> source licenses. >> >> On 19 April 2016 at 11:02, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> > These are *source* files so the licenses belong under license/src. >> > >> > Also the final section of the main LICENSE file is intended for >> > binary-only code. >> > (It's not all that obvious at present) >> > >> > On 19 April 2016 at 07:33, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi sebb, >> >> I filled in in root LICENSE file the license information for the 4 >> >> components. >> >> Do we need to also add the MIT license in license/bin folder ? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 19 April 2016 at 01:32, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > On 17 April 2016 at 18:03, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> Hello, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> The second release candidate for JMeter 3.0 (r1739623) has been >> >>> prepared, >> >>> >> and your votes are solicited. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> This release brings a lot of new features (over 100) and fixes many >> bugs >> >>> >> (60). >> >>> >> >> >>> >> If you can, some tests of this release candidate (load tests and/or >> >>> >> functional tests) with Java 7/8 on Linux/Windows/Mac OS on changes >> are >> >>> >> welcome. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> You can read the New and Noteworthy section with some screenshots to >> >>> >> illustrate improvements and full list of changes at: >> >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/changes.html >> >>> >> >> >>> >> JMeter is a Java desktop application designed to load test >> functional >> >>> >> behavior and measure performance. The current version is targeted at >> >>> Java >> >>> >> 7+. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Archives/hashes/sigs: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jmeter/v3.0_RC2/ >> >>> > >> >>> > FTR, the revision is: r13285 >> >>> > >> >>> >> RAT report: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/dist/rat-report-jmeter-3.0RC2.txt >> >>> >> >> >>> >> MD5 hashes of archives for this vote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> 8eab13c7c97cae7ad981adce73feaf7c *apache-jmeter-3.0.tgz >> >>> >> 0375b7ad7fb51698f647ab2d8649b242 *apache-jmeter-3.0.zip >> >>> >> 792fb612c2a8de5b4352579fcf4d09be *apache-jmeter-3.0_src.zip >> >>> >> 823b8257824644837ec451e025d293d4 *apache-jmeter-3.0_src.tgz >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Site Docs are here: >> >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Maven staging repository is accessible here: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejmeter-1007/org/apache/jmeter/ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Tag: >> >>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/tags/v3_0_RC2/ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Keys are here: >> >>> >> https://www.apache.org/dist/jmeter/KEYS >> >>> >> >> >>> >> N.B. >> >>> >> To download the dependencies: "ant download_jars" >> >>> >> >> >>> >> To create the jars and test JMeter: "ant package test". >> >>> >> >> >>> >> JMeter 3.0 requires Java 7 or later to run. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Some known issues and incompatible changes are listed on changes >> page. >> >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/changes.html >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> All feedback and vote are welcome. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> [ ] +1 I support this release >> >>> >> [ ] +0 I am OK with this release >> >>> >> [ ] -0 OK, but.... >> >>> >> [X] -1 I do not support this release (please indicate why) >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > (binding) >> >>> > >> >>> > Sorry but there are some files missing from the source archive: >> >>> > >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: .gitignore >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: .svn >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: .travis.yml >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7: LICENSE >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/bootstrap: >> >>> > LICENSE >> >>> > Only in >> >>> >> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/bootstrap-social: >> >>> > .gitignore >> >>> > Only in >> >>> >> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/datatables-responsive: >> >>> > .gitignore >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/flot: >> >>> > .gitignore >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/flot: >> >>> > Makefile >> >>> > Only in >> >>> >> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/font-awesome: >> >>> > .gitignore >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs: >> >>> > .gitattributes >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs: >> >>> > .gitignore >> >>> > Only in >> >>> >> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs/test: >> >>> > .gitignore >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/metisMenu: >> >>> > LICENSE >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/mocha: >> >>> > LICENSE >> >>> > Only in >> >>> v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/morrisjs: >> >>> > .gitignore >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: checkstyle-suppressions.xml >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: doap_JMeter.rdf >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: api >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: doc >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: ext >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: junit >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2: rat-excludes.txt >> >>> > Only in v3_0_RC2/test: resources >> >>> > >> >>> > The .* files are OK, as is the doap (we ought to move that) >> >>> > Also the lib subdirectories. >> >>> > >> >>> > But the rest ought to be in the source archives, or some should >> >>> > perhaps be dropped from SVN >> >>> >> >>> The LICENSE files are misplaced. >> >>> >> >>> The software items need to be mentioned in the main LICENSE file, and >> >>> stored under the licenses/ folder if necessary. >> >>> >> >>> It's important that the user does not have to go looking for LICENSE >> >>> files; they need to be all included or referenced from the top level >> >>> file. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > Also the source archives don't agree: docs is missing from the zip >> file >> >>> > >> >>> > Maybe we don't actually need to store the docs tree in SVN but if we >> >>> > do it should be in both the source archives. >> >>> > >> >>> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> The PMC members please indicate the mention "(binding)" with your >> vote. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Note: If the vote passes, the intention is to release the archive >> files >> >>> >> and rename the RC tag as the release tag. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Thanks in advance! >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Milamber >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cordialement. >> >> Philippe Mouawad. >> > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
