Hi Felix, Did you have time to look at this ? Thanks
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Felix Schumacher <felix.schumacher@ > internetallee.de> wrote: > >> Am Samstag, den 28.07.2018, 17:29 +0200 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> > Hello, >> > >> > @Felix, I reviewed the PR for the 62463, it looks good to me. >> > We could release with 62570 not fixed as it's an enhancement >> >> The fix for 62463 is only a partial fix. Try to run a distributed load >> test with fixed rmi port in the GUI. You will get exceptions, as the >> (remote) listeners will be instantiated more than one time and try to >> bind to the same fixed port. >> >> I am not sure to understand exactly what the bug is . > > I recently ran a NON Gui distributed test and had no issues. > Do it happens with any test plan, only in GUI mode ... ? > > It is not clear to me, what we should do with those listeners. >> > > Which ones ? > >> >> 1) they seem to be intended rather globally, but are local to a thread >> group. I think this is odd, at least >> >> 2) the should probably not be instantiated (cloned?) more than once in >> a test run >> >> What was the original intention for those listeners? Can they be >> implemented as global singleton like objects? If not, how is the other >> side of the remote connection able to distinguish those objects? >> >> For 62570 (enhancement related to validity of CA), I think I would be a >> good idea to add the hint about the property to the dialog that appears >> after the creation of a new CA. All further enhancements on this case >> can wait. >> > > yes, ok for me. > >> >> Regards, >> Felix >> >> > >> > Once committed, can we start a release 5.0 ? >> > We haven't released since >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Philippe Mouawad < >> > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks for feedback. >> > > Usually it’s a good thing to test integrity with sha of the file >> > > and >> > > compare it with the value we advertise. >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sunday, July 8, 2018, Jmeter Tea <jmeter...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > I downloaded again and now it's working, maybe I had a problem >> > > > with >> > > > downloading >> > > > >> > > > Thank you >> > > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Philippe Mouawad < >> > > > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hello, >> > > > > Which file did you download and from which link ? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Thank you >> > > > > >> > > > > On Sunday, July 8, 2018, Jmeter Tea <jmeter...@gmail.com> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I download latest nightly r1835292 and it failed to run due >> > > > > > to missing >> > > > > > files in bin folder as >> > > > > > jmeter.properties and log4j2.xml >> > > > > > >> > > > > > FYI >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >> > > > > > p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hello, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We have currently 64 bugs/enhancements implemented in trunk >> > > > > > > that >> > > > >> > > > would >> > > > > > > deserve a Major new version 5.0 : >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_ >> > > > > > > status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED& >> > > > > > > component=HTTP&component=Main&list_id=170488&order= >> > > > > > > Importance&product=JMeter&query_format=advanced& >> > > > > > > resolution=FIXED&target_ >> > > > > > > milestone=JMETER_4.1 >> > > > > > > <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_ >> > > > > > > status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED& >> > > > > > > component=HTTP&component=Main&list_id=170488&order= >> > > > > > > Importance&product=JMeter&query_format=advanced& >> > > > > >> > > > > resolution=FIXED&target_ >> > > > > > > milestone=JMETER_4.1> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think last commits deserve a deep review /tests related >> > > > > > > to : >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - Flow Control Action >> > > > > > > - Result Status Action >> > > > > > > - Iterating Controllers >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > If nobody finds a bug, the new version 5.0 should be >> > > > > > > released. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I propose to send a mail on user mailing list with >> > > > > > > following >> > > > >> > > > content: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > > > --- >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We'd like to release a new version 5.0 with following >> > > > > > > enhancements / >> > > > > > > bugfixes. >> > > > > > > We'd like tests and feedback from users. >> > > > > > > If you'd like to help testing, you can download a nightly >> > > > > > > build >> > > > > >> > > > > tomorrow: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Test particularly: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - Recording >> > > > > > > - Flow Control Action (old Test Action) >> > > > > > > - Result Status Action (break loop, switch to next >> > > > > > > iteration of >> > > > > > >> > > > > > current >> > > > > > > loop) >> > > > > > > - While Controller / Loop Controller / Foreach >> > > > > > > Controller >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We'll be waiting for 10 days. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > > > --- >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Regards. >> > > > > > > Philippe M. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Cordialement. >> > > > > Philippe Mouawad. >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Cordialement. >> > > Philippe Mouawad. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
