On Saturday, August 4, 2018, Felix Schumacher < felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> > > Am 2. August 2018 19:37:27 GMT+01:00 schrieb Philippe Mouawad < > philippe.moua...@gmail.com>: > >Hi Felix, > >Did you have time to look at this ? > > Sorry, haven't found the time, yet. But I think I had to add a listener > (probably result tree view) to get the exceptions. I guess issue exists since many versions, should it block release ? > > Regards, > Felix > > > > >Thanks > > > >On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > >philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Felix Schumacher <felix.schumacher@ > >> internetallee.de> wrote: > >> > >>> Am Samstag, den 28.07.2018, 17:29 +0200 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > >>> > Hello, > >>> > > >>> > @Felix, I reviewed the PR for the 62463, it looks good to me. > >>> > We could release with 62570 not fixed as it's an enhancement > >>> > >>> The fix for 62463 is only a partial fix. Try to run a distributed > >load > >>> test with fixed rmi port in the GUI. You will get exceptions, as the > >>> (remote) listeners will be instantiated more than one time and try > >to > >>> bind to the same fixed port. > >>> > >>> I am not sure to understand exactly what the bug is . > >> > >> I recently ran a NON Gui distributed test and had no issues. > >> Do it happens with any test plan, only in GUI mode ... ? > >> > >> It is not clear to me, what we should do with those listeners. > >>> > >> > >> Which ones ? > >> > >>> > >>> 1) they seem to be intended rather globally, but are local to a > >thread > >>> group. I think this is odd, at least > >>> > >>> 2) the should probably not be instantiated (cloned?) more than once > >in > >>> a test run > >>> > >>> What was the original intention for those listeners? Can they be > >>> implemented as global singleton like objects? If not, how is the > >other > >>> side of the remote connection able to distinguish those objects? > >>> > >>> For 62570 (enhancement related to validity of CA), I think I would > >be a > >>> good idea to add the hint about the property to the dialog that > >appears > >>> after the creation of a new CA. All further enhancements on this > >case > >>> can wait. > >>> > >> > >> yes, ok for me. > >> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Felix > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Once committed, can we start a release 5.0 ? > >>> > We haven't released since > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Philippe Mouawad < > >>> > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks for feedback. > >>> > > Usually it’s a good thing to test integrity with sha of the file > >>> > > and > >>> > > compare it with the value we advertise. > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On Sunday, July 8, 2018, Jmeter Tea <jmeter...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > I downloaded again and now it's working, maybe I had a problem > >>> > > > with > >>> > > > downloading > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Thank you > >>> > > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Philippe Mouawad < > >>> > > > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Hello, > >>> > > > > Which file did you download and from which link ? > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Thank you > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > On Sunday, July 8, 2018, Jmeter Tea <jmeter...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > I download latest nightly r1835292 and it failed to run > >due > >>> > > > > > to missing > >>> > > > > > files in bin folder as > >>> > > > > > jmeter.properties and log4j2.xml > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > FYI > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > >>> > > > > > p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com> wrote: > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Hello, > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > We have currently 64 bugs/enhancements implemented in > >trunk > >>> > > > > > > that > >>> > > > > >>> > > > would > >>> > > > > > > deserve a Major new version 5.0 : > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_ > >>> > > > > > > > >status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED& > >>> > > > > > > component=HTTP&component=Main&list_id=170488&order= > >>> > > > > > > Importance&product=JMeter&query_format=advanced& > >>> > > > > > > resolution=FIXED&target_ > >>> > > > > > > milestone=JMETER_4.1 > >>> > > > > > > <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_ > >>> > > > > > > status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED& > >>> > > > > > > component=HTTP&component=Main&list_id=170488&order= > >>> > > > > > > Importance&product=JMeter&query_format=advanced& > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > resolution=FIXED&target_ > >>> > > > > > > milestone=JMETER_4.1> > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > I think last commits deserve a deep review /tests > >related > >>> > > > > > > to : > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > - Flow Control Action > >>> > > > > > > - Result Status Action > >>> > > > > > > - Iterating Controllers > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > If nobody finds a bug, the new version 5.0 should be > >>> > > > > > > released. > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > I propose to send a mail on user mailing list with > >>> > > > > > > following > >>> > > > > >>> > > > content: > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > > > > > > --- > >>> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > We'd like to release a new version 5.0 with following > >>> > > > > > > enhancements / > >>> > > > > > > bugfixes. > >>> > > > > > > We'd like tests and feedback from users. > >>> > > > > > > If you'd like to help testing, you can download a > >nightly > >>> > > > > > > build > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > tomorrow: > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > - https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/ > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Test particularly: > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > - Recording > >>> > > > > > > - Flow Control Action (old Test Action) > >>> > > > > > > - Result Status Action (break loop, switch to next > >>> > > > > > > iteration of > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > current > >>> > > > > > > loop) > >>> > > > > > > - While Controller / Loop Controller / Foreach > >>> > > > > > > Controller > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > We'll be waiting for 10 days. > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > > > > > > --- > >>> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > >>> > > > > > > -- > >>> > > > > > > Regards. > >>> > > > > > > Philippe M. > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > -- > >>> > > > > Cordialement. > >>> > > > > Philippe Mouawad. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > Cordialement. > >>> > > Philippe Mouawad. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cordialement. > >> Philippe Mouawad. > >> > >> > >> > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
