Am 2. August 2018 19:37:27 GMT+01:00 schrieb Philippe Mouawad
<[email protected]>:
>Hi Felix,
>Did you have time to look at this ?
Sorry, haven't found the time, yet. But I think I had to add a listener
(probably result tree view) to get the exceptions.
Regards,
Felix
>
>Thanks
>
>On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Felix Schumacher <felix.schumacher@
>> internetallee.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Am Samstag, den 28.07.2018, 17:29 +0200 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > @Felix, I reviewed the PR for the 62463, it looks good to me.
>>> > We could release with 62570 not fixed as it's an enhancement
>>>
>>> The fix for 62463 is only a partial fix. Try to run a distributed
>load
>>> test with fixed rmi port in the GUI. You will get exceptions, as the
>>> (remote) listeners will be instantiated more than one time and try
>to
>>> bind to the same fixed port.
>>>
>>> I am not sure to understand exactly what the bug is .
>>
>> I recently ran a NON Gui distributed test and had no issues.
>> Do it happens with any test plan, only in GUI mode ... ?
>>
>> It is not clear to me, what we should do with those listeners.
>>>
>>
>> Which ones ?
>>
>>>
>>> 1) they seem to be intended rather globally, but are local to a
>thread
>>> group. I think this is odd, at least
>>>
>>> 2) the should probably not be instantiated (cloned?) more than once
>in
>>> a test run
>>>
>>> What was the original intention for those listeners? Can they be
>>> implemented as global singleton like objects? If not, how is the
>other
>>> side of the remote connection able to distinguish those objects?
>>>
>>> For 62570 (enhancement related to validity of CA), I think I would
>be a
>>> good idea to add the hint about the property to the dialog that
>appears
>>> after the creation of a new CA. All further enhancements on this
>case
>>> can wait.
>>>
>>
>> yes, ok for me.
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Felix
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Once committed, can we start a release 5.0 ?
>>> > We haven't released since
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Thanks for feedback.
>>> > > Usually it’s a good thing to test integrity with sha of the file
>>> > > and
>>> > > compare it with the value we advertise.
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sunday, July 8, 2018, Jmeter Tea <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > I downloaded again and now it's working, maybe I had a problem
>>> > > > with
>>> > > > downloading
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thank you
>>> > > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hello,
>>> > > > > Which file did you download and from which link ?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Thank you
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Sunday, July 8, 2018, Jmeter Tea <[email protected]>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Hi
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > I download latest nightly r1835292 and it failed to run
>due
>>> > > > > > to missing
>>> > > > > > files in bin folder as
>>> > > > > > jmeter.properties and log4j2.xml
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > FYI
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Hello,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > We have currently 64 bugs/enhancements implemented in
>trunk
>>> > > > > > > that
>>> > > >
>>> > > > would
>>> > > > > > > deserve a Major new version 5.0 :
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_
>>> > > > > > >
>status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&
>>> > > > > > > component=HTTP&component=Main&list_id=170488&order=
>>> > > > > > > Importance&product=JMeter&query_format=advanced&
>>> > > > > > > resolution=FIXED&target_
>>> > > > > > > milestone=JMETER_4.1
>>> > > > > > > <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_
>>> > > > > > > status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&
>>> > > > > > > component=HTTP&component=Main&list_id=170488&order=
>>> > > > > > > Importance&product=JMeter&query_format=advanced&
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > resolution=FIXED&target_
>>> > > > > > > milestone=JMETER_4.1>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > I think last commits deserve a deep review /tests
>related
>>> > > > > > > to :
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > - Flow Control Action
>>> > > > > > > - Result Status Action
>>> > > > > > > - Iterating Controllers
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > If nobody finds a bug, the new version 5.0 should be
>>> > > > > > > released.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > I propose to send a mail on user mailing list with
>>> > > > > > > following
>>> > > >
>>> > > > content:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>---------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > > ---
>>> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > We'd like to release a new version 5.0 with following
>>> > > > > > > enhancements /
>>> > > > > > > bugfixes.
>>> > > > > > > We'd like tests and feedback from users.
>>> > > > > > > If you'd like to help testing, you can download a
>nightly
>>> > > > > > > build
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > tomorrow:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > - https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Test particularly:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > - Recording
>>> > > > > > > - Flow Control Action (old Test Action)
>>> > > > > > > - Result Status Action (break loop, switch to next
>>> > > > > > > iteration of
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > current
>>> > > > > > > loop)
>>> > > > > > > - While Controller / Loop Controller / Foreach
>>> > > > > > > Controller
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > We'll be waiting for 10 days.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>---------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > > ---
>>> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > Regards.
>>> > > > > > > Philippe M.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > --
>>> > > > > Cordialement.
>>> > > > > Philippe Mouawad.
>>> > > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Cordialement.
>>> > > Philippe Mouawad.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
