+1 from me as well. Steve
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 7:28 PM Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: > After some discussion over the past month or so, there seems to be enough > of a consensus to hold a vote on retiring Apache jUDDI. I've pretty much > been the only maintainer for a while now and unfortunately have a number of > outstanding issues that I can't solve without assistance from the community. > > Unfortunately, most, if not all, of the committers and other community > members have moved on to other projects. Usage of the UDDI specification > and Apache jUDDI has never really been that high in general. Recently over > the fast few years, JIRA issue reporting, mailing list traffic and all > known out of band traffic have been near zero. Download statistics are > pretty minimal as well and if anyone is using our libraries, there's little > recent evidence to support that via mvnreponsitory.com's cross reference > capabilities. > > The process for moving a project to the Attic is outlined here: > https://attic.apache.org/process.html > > On Nov 11th, an email was dispatched to both the user and dev lists about > this with no replies. It's time for the formal vote. > > +1 from me > -- Steve Viens svi...@gmail.com 603-828-2397
