I emailed the board regarding minimum voting thresholds for project closure. Former director Sheng Wu gave the following input > I think 3 +1binding and no -1 binding are enough.
No other responses were received from the board. At this point with our current +3 votes plus previous unanimous email correspondence on retirement, I'm comfortable calling this vote a "pass". I'll notify the board and continue the process. Cheers On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:39 AM Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: > Our voting policy for *releases *is below, however I'm not clear if > there's another voting policy for other project wide issues. Does anyone > remember or have documented any other voting policies for this project? > > This vote will be open for > the next 72 hours per the release policy, which is: > - the vote will be closed as soon as 6 hours have past and >7 +1 > votes are received with no -1 vote being cast, or > - if after 12h >5 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or > - if after 24h if 3 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or failing > that > - after 72h provided at least 3 +1 votes have been cast and there is > a majority of +1 votes from the cast votes. > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 8:36 AM Steve Viens <svi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (resend) >> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:42 AM Kurt Stam <kurt.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 from me >>> >>> —Kurt >>> >>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 01:00, Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Resending...2 votes is not enough to pass, otherwise the board may have >>> to take action directly >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:52 PM Steve Viens <svi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 from me as well. >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 7:28 PM Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> After some discussion over the past month or so, there seems to be >>>>> enough of a consensus to hold a vote on retiring Apache jUDDI. I've pretty >>>>> much been the only maintainer for a while now and unfortunately have a >>>>> number of outstanding issues that I can't solve without assistance from >>>>> the >>>>> community. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, most, if not all, of the committers and other community >>>>> members have moved on to other projects. Usage of the UDDI specification >>>>> and Apache jUDDI has never really been that high in general. Recently over >>>>> the fast few years, JIRA issue reporting, mailing list traffic and all >>>>> known out of band traffic have been near zero. Download statistics are >>>>> pretty minimal as well and if anyone is using our libraries, there's >>>>> little >>>>> recent evidence to support that via mvnreponsitory.com's cross >>>>> reference capabilities. >>>>> >>>>> The process for moving a project to the Attic is outlined here: >>>>> https://attic.apache.org/process.html >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 11th, an email was dispatched to both the user and dev lists >>>>> about this with no replies. It's time for the formal vote. >>>>> >>>>> +1 from me >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Steve Viens >>>> svi...@gmail.com >>>> 603-828-2397 >>>> >>> -- >> Steve Viens >> svi...@gmail.com >> 603-828-2397 >> >
