Hey all,

Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty
straightforward
and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly.

Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Kowshik,
>
> Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" section
> of the AK 2.6.0 release plan (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430
> ).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Randall
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam <kpraka...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Randall,
> >
> > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will not be
> > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to include
> it
> > in a next release.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kowshik
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada <
> > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Randall Hauch
> > >
> > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in April -
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952
> > > .
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Maulin
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release.
> > > >
> > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been updated
> to
> > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut the
> `2.6`
> > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email announcing
> > the
> > > > new branch.
> > > >
> > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on JUNE
> > 10,
> > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the release
> > > branch.
> > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release
> branch.
> > > >
> > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or (better
> > yet)
> > > > reply to this thread.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, and best regards!
> > > >
> > > > Randall
> > > >
> > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Randall!
> > > > >
> > > > > I added missing KIP-594.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 as
> both
> > > are
> > > > > completed.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote:
> > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Based on the release plan (
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430
> > > > > ),
> > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work that is
> > not
> > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release
> (either
> > > 2.7
> > > > or
> > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing completion,
> and
> > > > we're
> > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email later
> > > today
> > > > > or
> > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the release
> branch
> > > > > shortly
> > > > > > thereafter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release plan
> > > page (
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430
> > > > > ),
> > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks like
> it
> > is
> > > > not
> > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong table,
> > please
> > > > let
> > > > > me
> > > > > > know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply
> to
> > > > this
> > > > > > thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, and best regards!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Randall
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > > sop...@confluent.io
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hey Randall,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks!
> > > > > >> Sophie
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes before
> > > > today’s
> > > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks for
> > driving
> > > > > this!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley <
> tbent...@redhat.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Hi Randall,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol here,
> > but
> > > > > >> thought
> > > > > >>>> it better to ask than to just add it myself).
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Tom
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch <
> rha...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Greetings!
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the next
> > > time-based
> > > > > >>>> feature
> > > > > >>>>> release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release plan at
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430
> > > > > >>>>> ,
> > > > > >>>>> and have included all of the KIPs that are currently approved
> > or
> > > > > >>> actively
> > > > > >>>>> in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as necessary).
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on May
> 20
> > > > with a
> > > > > >>>>> target release date of June 24.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Let me know if there are any objections.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>> Randall Hauch
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to