Thanks for the update, folks! Based upon Jira [1], we currently have 4 issues that are considered blockers for the 2.6.0 release and production of RCs:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10134 - High CPU issue during rebalance in Kafka consumer after upgrading to 2.5 (unassigned) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10143 - Can no longer change replication throttle with reassignment tool (Jason G) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10166 - Excessive TaskCorruptedException seen in testing (Sophie, Bruno) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 - BufferUnderflowException during Kafka Streams Upgrade (John R) and one critical issue that may be a regression that at this time will not block production of RCs: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10017 - Flaky Test EosBetaUpgradeIntegrationTest.shouldUpgradeFromEosAlphaToEosBeta (Matthias) and one build/release issue we'd like to fix if possible but will not block RCs or the release: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9381 - kafka-streams-scala: Javadocs + Scaladocs not published on maven central (me) I'm working with the assignees and reporters of these issues (via comments on the issues) to identify an ETA and to track progress. Anyone is welcome to chime in on those issues. At this time, no other changes (other than PRs that only fix/improve tests) should be merged to the `2.6` branch. If you think you've identified a new blocker issue or believe another existing issue should be treated as a blocker for 2.6.0, please mark the issue's `fix version` as `2.6.0` _and_ respond to this thread with details, and I will work with you to determine whether it is indeed a blocker. As always, let me know here if you have any questions/concerns. Best regards, Randall [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/versions/12346918 On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM Mario Molina <mmoli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Randal, > > Ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9018 is not a blocker > so > it can be moved to the 2.7.0 version. > > Mario > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:22, Boyang Chen <reluctanthero...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hey Randal, > > > > There was another spotted blocker: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10173 > > As of current, John is working on a fix. > > > > Boyang > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > Just a heads up that we discovered a new blocker. The fix is pretty > > > straightforward > > > and there's already a PR for it so it should be resolved quickly. > > > > > > Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10198 > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:52 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, Kowshik, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update on KIP-584. This is listed on the "Postponed" > > > section > > > > of the AK 2.6.0 release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > ). > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kowshik Prakasam < > > kpraka...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > > > We have to remove KIP-584 from the release plan, as this item will > > not > > > be > > > > > completed for 2.6 release (although KIP is accepted). We plan to > > > include > > > > it > > > > > in a next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Kowshik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:43 AM Maulin Vasavada < > > > > > maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we add KIP-519 to 2.6? It was merged to Trunk already in > April > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128650952 > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Maulin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:01 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's an update on the AK 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code freeze was Wednesday, and the release plan [1] has been > > > updated > > > > to > > > > > > > reflect all of the KIPs that made the release. We've also cut > the > > > > `2.6` > > > > > > > branch that we'll use for the release; see separate email > > > announcing > > > > > the > > > > > > > new branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The next important date for the 2.6.0 release is CODE FREEZE on > > > JUNE > > > > > 10, > > > > > > > and until that date all bug fixes are still welcome on the > > release > > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > But after that, only blocker bugs can be merged to the release > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or > > (better > > > > > yet) > > > > > > > reply to this thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] AK 2.6.0 Release Plan: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Matthias J. Sax < > > mj...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Randall! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I added missing KIP-594. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the postponed KIP section: I removed KIP-441 and KIP-444 > as > > > > both > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > completed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/27/20 2:31 PM, Randall Hauch wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey everyone, just a quick update on the 2.6.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the release plan ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > > > today (May 27) is feature freeze. Any major feature work > that > > > is > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > already complete will need to push out to the next release > > > > (either > > > > > > 2.7 > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > 3.0). There are a few PRs for KIPs that are nearing > > completion, > > > > and > > > > > > > we're > > > > > > > > > having some Jenkins build issues. I will send another email > > > later > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > early tomorrow with an update, and I plan to cut the > release > > > > branch > > > > > > > > shortly > > > > > > > > > thereafter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also updated the list of planned KIPs on the release > > > plan > > > > > > page ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > ), > > > > > > > > > and I've moved to the "Postponed" table any KIP that looks > > like > > > > it > > > > > is > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > going to be complete today. If any KIP is in the wrong > table, > > > > > please > > > > > > > let > > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to > > > reply > > > > to > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, and best regards! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Randall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > > > > > > sop...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hey Randall, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Can you also add KIP-613 which was accepted yesterday? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > > > > >> Sophie > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:47 AM Randall Hauch < > > > rha...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Hi, Tom. I saw last night that the KIP had enough votes > > > before > > > > > > > today’s > > > > > > > > >>> deadline and I will add it to the roadmap today. Thanks > for > > > > > driving > > > > > > > > this! > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:18 AM Tom Bentley < > > > > tbent...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Can we add KIP-585? (I'm not quite sure of the protocol > > > here, > > > > > but > > > > > > > > >> thought > > > > > > > > >>>> it better to ask than to just add it myself). > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> Tom > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:54 PM Randall Hauch < > > > > rha...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Greetings! > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I'd like to volunteer to be release manager for the > next > > > > > > time-based > > > > > > > > >>>> feature > > > > > > > > >>>>> release which will be 2.6.0. I've published a release > > plan > > > at > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=152113430 > > > > > > > > >>>>> , > > > > > > > > >>>>> and have included all of the KIPs that are currently > > > approved > > > > > or > > > > > > > > >>> actively > > > > > > > > >>>>> in discussion (though I'm happy to adjust as > necessary). > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> To stay on our time-based cadence, the KIP freeze is on > > May > > > > 20 > > > > > > > with a > > > > > > > > >>>>> target release date of June 24. > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let me know if there are any objections. > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > >>>>> Randall Hauch > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
