Hi All, Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can form a consensus around this.
Thanks On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > Thanks for the KIP! > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <soa...@apple.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > > Another +1 here, also non-binding. > > > > Thank you Omnia! > > > > -- > > Igor > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks! > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi > > >> Can I get a vote on this, please? > > >> > > >> Best > > >> Omnia > > >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim < > o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here > > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim < > o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to > control > > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here > > >>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention > > >>>> > > >>>> Please vote in this thread. > > >>>> Thanks > > >>>> Omnia > > >>>> > > >>> > > > >
