Hi, Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP? Thanks On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can form a > consensus around this. > > Thanks > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> Thanks for the KIP! >> >> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <soa...@apple.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> > >> > Another +1 here, also non-binding. >> > >> > Thank you Omnia! >> > >> > -- >> > Igor >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote: >> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks! >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi >> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please? >> > >> >> > >> Best >> > >> Omnia >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim < >> o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here >> > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html >> > >>> >> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim < >> o.g.h.ibra...@gmail.com> >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Hi everyone, >> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to >> control >> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here >> > >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Please vote in this thread. >> > >>>> Thanks >> > >>>> Omnia >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > > >> >
